Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 14 February 2019 23:00 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA27B131218 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:00:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=C7q57klW; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Sm2odJjY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MuD7ZaPjeJhS for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:00:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A066131053 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:00:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=20680; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1550185227; x=1551394827; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=/Fk11nlh/blyMPTyap519X8Vll3ljKE9sJxg/cjkQf8=; b=C7q57klWLG3uvMZRAcAQER3tCAYn6PuvOpnDPbGgKaiprskRJjZfxLnv pNM7v5F6ZlVp9u7zXF0tpy7gWTZ7YeUmpBUd1TXRYzKAmYguHSwrwf8ps ho5Y5AfXBy8gUaqPE0qECkzIGHQuge1NT/Ml3c45Bilij7UsHT5zzM3hJ U=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:Bvm3ix37XGZ0ZNKLsmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxGCt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8TgZdYBUERoMiMEYhQslVceOBEDTJ//xZCt8F8NHBxdo
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AEAAAu8mVc/4gNJK1kGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBME8DZ3QECycKg3yDRwOEUIsmSoFoJZgTFIEQA1QLAQEjCYRAAheDTCI0CQ0BAwEBAgEBAm0cDIVKAQEBBCMRDAEBLAwLBAIBCBEDAQEBAQICIwMCAgIwFAEICAIEARIbgwUBgVoDFQECDKALAooUcYEvgngBAQWBBQGEBRiCCwMFgQuLOReBf4E4DBOCTIMeBBiBFAESAQcvgnIxgiaJfYglhRmLGVwJAoc4ixoZgW6JEodzijqFQ4wuAgQCBAUCDQEBBYFGOGVxcBU7KgGCQYIcg26KHAE2cgEBgSaNAIEfAYEeAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,370,1544486400"; d="scan'208";a="434278266"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Feb 2019 23:00:25 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x1EN0PWW014181 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:00:25 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:00:24 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-aln-001.cisco.com (173.37.135.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:00:24 -0600
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:00:23 -0600
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=/Fk11nlh/blyMPTyap519X8Vll3ljKE9sJxg/cjkQf8=; b=Sm2odJjYpU4xeVkcUqVWMq8a57hJZpQx7L32jZc0qgCYO2Ki24c8Z1a5sXw9XzP7Dj4EIOteN0t8u6v9T5ifV/dUhc7gS9ddly5+edZqWZMNYi7xkF6Wta+WvEwFGyX+H1u/tkW8SBbReWrYLAoCM9s0T4dV5Xjodui/Xxl5ROM=
Received: from BN8PR11MB3683.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.220.74) by BN8PR11MB3587.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.218.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1622.16; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:00:22 +0000
Received: from BN8PR11MB3683.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d042:6a6e:589b:b242]) by BN8PR11MB3683.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d042:6a6e:589b:b242%6]) with mapi id 15.20.1601.023; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:00:22 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "Peter Psenak (ppsenak)" <ppsenak@cisco.com>, Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]
Thread-Index: AQHUuilUUaWOLI4OpkiOe3VLnvRruqXMT1YAgAH73ACAEK7HlIAAbDCAgABD0YA=
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:00:22 +0000
Message-ID: <0DDB3857-51E8-4704-B01C-54BC5A6912B7@cisco.com>
References: <sa65zu31zqk.fsf@chopps.org> <sa64l9n1yqy.fsf@chopps.org> <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D463B3B9D8@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <8378287F-27B9-4663-A22B-F8A2EC6C9FC3@cisco.com> <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D463B46315@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <f3dca967-9adc-d67f-2606-548624ceef91@cisco.com> <5316A0AB3C851246A7CA5758973207D463B4A6AB@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <25021deb-2032-9fcc-4bf4-fcaaa21598b9@cisco.com> <BYAPR05MB50297AC638F8974BAC6A5006C7670@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR05MB50297AC638F8974BAC6A5006C7670@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.83]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1feaba12-67e6-414e-d49f-08d692d0330d
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600110)(711020)(4605077)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BN8PR11MB3587;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR11MB3587:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 4
x-ld-processed: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e,ExtAddr
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;BN8PR11MB3587;23:VK0nBIz6zynn1ZtfwjmZqezjy4ggfeQ82Rj8gMLEfdT4/k7z1cTL6nOgvhBj1pjJ+f6xTj20mguINGNjSdpiNiuAGrRSZP5p5+Vkzn8T8QGy4mlqVBPkkqZxXiOj1XueOOdsm5ZJm5/Bdz8Host0j8tEIsBuQYKsN4l1WkDT4MERqIPU271s7DeNfT56dTIQ53Se9GhSfb0VQGpDq02gvU9Gwj63p+DISYu8JNma0cetffkkiGCH2js7ok/T2f7KuhfJbSnyEmqy2RFiQaHPwB1Pi9IH1ShXxZWFn/doNCoDobgCE/aT+VjF6HJwl0dKb97EL/XV7mY3O3h4dyM2a3Alp9zB8LZbngYZLMf+Vb+jQ2DaAhOL38DrGZW70NgCB3uuYyAp8RK73IOxdkCD3BXuoAHyavdJY5zKvbpRhbMhPqpPLWhnaN13n+FI7VhOdO4IE+7EqXBMJaJygV7LOEwWxKo33BcYWhSMYAYCWVrPQayGJtM4VBGHyyhKTOpTPBdJmXdkXqOQpJuShQAjEHVCq0xyxA1zK3yLZLTtWnPccGRCA/CY5VscML+Rzu8Ln4H+trsIEOFvRv33xAnphNPlij+XELC1/Viuxd7ipZQBC8aEEun5WRaa7NPJMAo+h6aLrrhOHqUmoPdPu9091N0Jf7EYstdfd11A9JMmKa4qFl9HTxAPUSVxmT48Y3TEEg1HhL85tbMdq57s3q6KQeHteD50s/jozInlbJ/HZbDJFeQcWwiXyZ5dpT91pP4QrCkBU50OGsy36uTqSW2RW1iKBkFpNFzR58SN3o9f/m4vaFmeH30nEnw8LzM5AqGNQYz9t0DJKIngN4VPxnxMi4AobRt7UBouzsciIER106XfK2eCyKk/evINZjE+s9gUkupBRwcI+Be9UT3a7JqMUDuCKMN76ez/gORghBSCriwlSBlbdOp6bCp6nGYoml6vL79ZhCvFRn6+RiUVFubYoS/iLKUSPXo0Wty6hIIgawb3AZ8ZhuJh0UfdNivbGCsWtfH+fZHCTxTcPy5TZUSitnsJ1byPjFbja239mz+nRiXa2X7k0urLArZ1dM+7gJoaO+HV46S48e7RFJ3h+rDbD+aCjNafqbAJCm3Rwa8Odl9oa7JgWbpzyTu7f7Kj8rZs3v1qlgKHy1ktIiLgMPSBWPp92+DKxPTe9SLETl5b1O4MTmDoGXQGdXQ6X+hn7A3KZZv4wjuWoYUQWEYmRT/YidxqCfj7RWQ5krzdJZbv2nmNp2u1wT1kXsVySkA7KdbyfjBr6pEPR2jRSS2ZpGdkJJiaIQuPB9GOAPtTonCkCtVXR30pvrVZ4yY0xuUxk+5bqSkaMlyNL+awmVITFZ7aJQUGAJZeYbiEZ6+vB9x32k8j5/J7QmHoY93xax+ljmV0tNuJZh7MR9yeHPaOpePnMjoMb0UUFRjV9G90u/mznRGW/tKgA1/2zKhpF7isIvE/
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR11MB3587890565D1051B09CBE16AC2670@BN8PR11MB3587.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 09480768F8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(346002)(51444003)(53754006)(55674003)(199004)(189003)(13464003)(68736007)(229853002)(97736004)(30864003)(36756003)(99286004)(2501003)(102836004)(25786009)(6306002)(256004)(19627235002)(53546011)(6436002)(6512007)(6506007)(53946003)(82746002)(186003)(1941001)(6486002)(76176011)(93886005)(106356001)(105586002)(26005)(305945005)(7736002)(33656002)(83716004)(8676002)(71200400001)(316002)(486006)(81156014)(71190400001)(8936002)(81166006)(86362001)(6246003)(478600001)(3846002)(66066001)(14454004)(6116002)(53936002)(446003)(966005)(110136005)(11346002)(2616005)(476003)(2906002)(21314003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN8PR11MB3587; H:BN8PR11MB3683.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: t75VBjzH50utWEyToXrLqAURUngcbtX+kXYEbpr7wTqZrzoEigkKcIIe8XFRB32sl3N9UZSXvA+Kphu4BBpYEc4MN3VUHk6MHbhRPeJSIT9Ba2rT9cwPhffgzZ0q4T9OHkNoOL5kTZZJ6Eir8EEdxEOuBMgGpXkpHdpK5Q4DRD+xo5UaaIEPgfl37abxh8GsgTvd/c8dfXmPmsiMme6FR9PfF/WdJPbWubdR8C9WtKlpd38vxOc9XVxeeYCrBHDiKfcxXQ5pgcLemDCSApZHs2sm+BprMOXlPmPDCE5sX/i/Q+Z0JNdCYk2U+6AxZ3z9Xl0CnOpiPL82JH2em8y6GMIo1nZXvXDZvxc9saJceTfWLJ57MceezSmHpiu0r+e+rYa77sQkMxfZITOw78modZobeXtFzR3by04ULjJXOok=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <BCFC75391BE1A449A289B114865050D8@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1feaba12-67e6-414e-d49f-08d692d0330d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 14 Feb 2019 23:00:22.6200 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR11MB3587
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.11, xch-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/GnCeFJ9MgJatKqBEvS3x0eijZeQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux]
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:00:32 -0000
Speaking as a WG member, I just re-read section 6.7 and all the actions for distributed computation are pretty much intuitive corollaries for the actions for the centralized solution. I see no real reason to remove these. However, there is nothing to prevent improvements to be proposed in an alternate draft. Thanks, Acee On 2/14/19, 8:58 AM, "John E Drake" <jdrake@juniper.net> wrote: Hi, I completely agree with Peter. Yours Irrespectively, John > -----Original Message----- > From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Peter Psenak > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 2:30 AM > To: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) > <acee@cisco.com>; Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>; lsr@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux] > > Hi Huaimo, > > On 13/02/2019 22:50 , Huaimo Chen wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > My explanations/answers are in line below with prefix [HC]. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppsenak@cisco.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 4:58 AM > > To: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) > > <acee@cisco.com>; Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>; lsr@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux] > > > > Hi Huaimo, > > > > On 03/02/2019 17:58 , Huaimo Chen wrote: > >> Hi Acee, > >> > >> > >> > >> I agree with you on keeping the signaling for two modes. The > >> other parts for the distributed solution need to be removed. > > optimized flooding is not only about algorithm to calculate the flooding > topology and the way it is distributed/computed. It is also about local rules to > make sure the flooding remains consistent. These are _independent_ of > centralized/distributed modes. And it make no sense to specify these rules in > two drafts. > > > > There are no "other" parts specific for the distributed solution. > > > > [HC] Some behaviors for the distributed solution/mode are described in draft- > li-dynamic-flooding. For example, there are a few of places from page 27 to 30, > which define the behaviors specific for the distributed solution/mode. > > I strongly disagree. The fact that we say in centralized mode area leader > recomputes and in distributed mode all nodes recompute make no difference in > behavior. > > thanks, > Peter > > > > > draft-li-dyanmic-flooding defines: > > > > 1. the signalling that is common and used by both modes 2. distribution of the > flooding-topology, which is specific to centralized mode 3. common behavior of > the nodes that support the extension, which is independent of the mode of > operation. > > > > [HC] In addition to these, draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction defines more, > including concrete protections, operations, and algorithms for computing a > flooding topology. > > > > Best Regards, > > Huaimo > > > > thanks, > > Peter > > > > > >> > >> > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> > >> Huaimo > >> > >> *From:* Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] > >> *Sent:* Sunday, February 3, 2019 11:45 AM > >> *To:* Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>; Christian Hopps > >> <chopps@chopps.org>; lsr@ietf.org > >> *Subject:* Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft > >> Redux] > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi Huaimo, > >> > >> > >> > >> See inline. > >> > >> > >> > >> *From: *Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org>> on > >> behalf of Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com > >> <mailto:huaimo.chen@huawei.com>> > >> *Date: *Saturday, February 2, 2019 at 12:27 AM > >> *To: *Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org <mailto:chopps@chopps.org>>, > >> "lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>" <lsr@ietf.org > >> <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>> > >> *Subject: *Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft > >> Redux] > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi Everyone, > >> > >> > >> > >> We proposed the distributed solution first, and Tony proposed the > >> centralized solution first. Tony added the distributed solution > >> (except for the algorithms to compute flooding topology) into his > >> draft. And then we added the centralized solution into our draft. The > >> latest versions of the two drafts have largely converged at least at > >> the high level to a solution for solving the same problem. > >> > >> > >> > >> Our draft has multiple key technical advantages over Tony's draft as > >> we described in our email to the LSR list, which are summarized below: > >> > >> 1. It uses a fraction of flooding resource (i.e., it is multiple > >> times more efficient in flooding topology encoding); > >> > >> 2. It provides fault tolerance to multiple failures, minimizing > >> impact on network convergence, thus minimizing traffic lose; and > >> > >> 3. It is simpler and needs less processing time (i.e., faster and > >> more efficient) in multiple scenarios. > >> > >> Based on the technical merits, our draft should be moved forward. > >> However, Chair proposed to move Tony's draft forward and have us work > >> on a distributed algorithm as we started with. > >> > >> > >> > >> I think that the distributed solution in Tony's draft needs to be > >> removed and they work on the centralized solution. We remove the > >> centralized solution from our draft and work on the distributed solution. > >> > >> > >> > >> I'm against "cutting the baby in half" given that the signaling for > >> the distributed solution is a proper subset of what is required for > >> the centralized solution. It is undesirable to have different > >> signaling for the two modes. For the distributed algorithm you are > >> proposing, do see problems with the signaling? > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Acee > >> > >> > >> > >> Best Regards, > >> > >> Huaimo > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> > >> From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps > >> > >> Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 7:26 AM > >> > >> To: lsr@ietf.org <mailto:lsr@ietf.org> > >> > >> Cc: chopps@chopps.org <mailto:chopps@chopps.org> > >> > >> Subject: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draft Redux] > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Summary of where we are at with dynamic flooding reduction: > >> > >> > >> > >> - We have a well written original work that came first and described > >> the problems as well as a TLVs to allow for a centralized solution > >> (draft-li-dyanmic-flooding). We do not need to standardize the > >> centralized algorithm. > >> > >> > >> > >> - A small change to this work allowed for distributed algorithms and > >> for outside work on distributed algorithms to continue in parallel. > >> > >> > >> > >> - We have another original work that started primarily as a > >> distributed algorithm > >> > >> (draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction) > >> > >> > >> > >> - Finally we also have: > >> > >> - Cross-pollination of ideas. > >> > >> - Failed attempts at merging. > >> > >> - An authors list "Arms-Race". > >> > >> > >> > >> Moving forward: > >> > >> > >> > >> - During IETF 103 I proposed we have no conflict if we: > >> > >> > >> > >> 1) adopt draft-li-lsr-dyanmic-flooding as the base WG document. > >> > >> 2) have authors of draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction work on a > >> distributed algorithm as they started with. > >> > >> > >> > >> - Acee agreed during the meeting (as chair) that this was the best > >> way forward. We had some agreement form the floor as well.. > >> > >> > >> > >> - Any good ideas regarding the distribution of a centralized topology > >> can be debated and added (with appropriate attribution) to the base > >> document after we adopt one. > >> > >> > >> > >> - This is what happens when we adopt a document as WG work, we work on > it. > >> > >> > >> > >> - The original authors of the distributed solution can continue to > >> work on their distributed algorithm in a separate document which > >> would also need standardization. > >> > >> > >> > >> Does anyone see a serious problem with this path forward? > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Chris & Acee. > >> > >> LSR Chairs. > >> > >> > >> > >> Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org <mailto:chopps@chopps.org>> writes: > >> > >> > >> > >>> We've had the authors of the individual conflicting drafts take a > >>> shot > >> at merging their work. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> This has failed. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> Here is the full history (which I also summarized during IETF103 as > >> well). I will send a second email discussing this. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Jan 2, 2018 Publication: draft-li-dynamic-flooding and > >> drfat-li-dynamic-flooding-isis > >> > >>> published centralized solution. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Mar 5, 2018 Publication: draft-cc-isis-flooding-reduction and > >> draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction > >> > >>> published distributed solution. > >> > >>> - mention of centralized solution asserting it is not good choice. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - IETF 101 (Mar 2018) > >> > >>> - Video: > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.youtube.com_ > >> watch-3Fv-3DqHmT4ytMn4w-26list-3DPLC86T-2D6ZTP5j- > 5FHaBNdfP&d=DwICAg&c > >> =HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT- > h5LGhEW > >> H- > s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=kykK2jUejhafPHOrWXu0yvNk7XsXUoDYsWjFoFGHeT > g&s > >> =cBWxI4Hu1GZNWxuUZRREnZNg-cZZYbdrLHRXKsUama4&e= > >> bgxGIp22cnaWS > >> > >>> - Minutes: > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf > >> .org_meeting_101_materials_minutes-2D101-2Dlsr- > 2D00&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh > >> 63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH- > s_xXX > >> > up3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=kykK2jUejhafPHOrWXu0yvNk7XsXUoDYsWjFoFGHeTg&s= > 1UTDcj > >> zO1b-Ful7k87ItzHcvqzRveIK_m_FI9eIDLFs&e= > >> > >>> - draft-li-dynamic-flooding-02 presented (1 author). at IETF 101 > >> > >>> - Generally well received. > >> > >>> - draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-00 (4 authors) presented. > >> > >>> - Serious problems immediately found during presentation -- not > >> fully baked. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Mar 18, 2018 draft-li-dynamic-flooding-03 published (1 author) > >> > >>> - Mar 27, 2018 draft-li-dynamic-flooding-04 published (1 author) > >> > >>> - Apr 20, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-01 revised > >> > >>> - Jun 28, 2018 draft-li-dynamic-flooding-05 published (2 authors) > >> > >>> - *SMALL CHANGE TO SUPPORT DISTRIBUTED ALGORITHM*. > >> > >>> - Does not specify distributed algorithm only how to indicate one > >>> in > >> use, small change. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Jul 2, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-02 published > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - IETF 102 (Jul 14, 2018) > >> > >>> - draft-li-dynamic-flooding-05 presented. > >> > >>> - draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-02 presented. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Sep 12, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-03 (4 authors) > >> > >>> - *LARGE CHANGE ADDS NEW CENTRALIZED SOLUTION*. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Sep 20, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-04 (4 authors) > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Oct 21, 2018 draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-00 and -01 (5 authors) > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - IETF 103 (Nov 3, 2018) > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Chairs give direction > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-05 having come first, being well > >> written and not > >> > >>> specifying a distributed algorithm (merely allowing for one) > >>> is > >> the correct vehicle > >> > >>> to adopt as a base document. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Distributed algorithm work (the original basis for > >> draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction) > >> > >>> should continue as a separate document form the base which > >>> would > >> thus we have no > >> > >>> conflicts. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - In the meantime the authors try and merge work, this fails. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Dec 3, 2018 draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 (7 authors) > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Dec 10, 2018 draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-00 (4 authors) > >> > >>> > >> > >>> - Jan 7, 2019 draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01 (8 authors) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Lsr mailing list > >> Lsr@ietf.org > >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mai > >> lman_listinfo_lsr&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK- > ndb3voDTXcWz > >> oCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH- > s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=kykK2jUejhafPHOrW > >> > Xu0yvNk7XsXUoDYsWjFoFGHeTg&s=BTZ1l1KpTxr_U3n0pZnknvuPBGxRM9ul08q > CKpaE > >> eXk&e= > >> > > > > . > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_lsr&d=DwICAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0 > UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH- > s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=kykK2jUejhafPHOrWXu0yvNk7XsXUoDYsWjFoFGHeT > g&s=BTZ1l1KpTxr_U3n0pZnknvuPBGxRM9ul08qCKpaEeXk&e=
- [Lsr] Flooding Reduction Draft Redux Christian Hopps
- [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction Draf… Christian Hopps
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … John E Drake
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … David Allan I
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] Flooding Reduction Draft Redux Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Lsr] Flooding Reduction Draft Redux Christian Hopps
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Naiming Shen (naiming)
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … li zhenqiang
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … David Allan I
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … tony.li
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … David Allan I
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- [Lsr] 答复: Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Lizhenbin
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Christian Hopps
- Re: [Lsr] 答复: Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduct… Christian Hopps
- Re: [Lsr] 答复: Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduct… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] 答复: Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduct… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] 答复: Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduct… Huzhibo
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Huaimo Chen
- [Lsr] 回复: Re: 答复: Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Re… li zhenqiang
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … John E Drake
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Tony Li
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Lsr] Moving Forward [Re: Flooding Reduction … Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)