Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 20 May 2020 10:32 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103BA3A07BA; Wed, 20 May 2020 03:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4XgFmvm0FvNp; Wed, 20 May 2020 03:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A54233A07AF; Wed, 20 May 2020 03:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id l17so2603456wrr.4; Wed, 20 May 2020 03:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tqVojdobICDatFdrmRU+JZR5kZqCnzb6fyHjN69jtq4=; b=U9G6U5GN4lJtWbwhsaLzWya4kzE4jCAZkMBp1L/D2Uxpt1VhOv60FA4WdmUnF9Dr2Z XGjmF5Sk2XnCpfoUFnQaM2XDfluvNchxvImnyIalzQ0mDlLz57r1gD00OzzpseauIXlP EoJUUAQs0WufJR1GsJ+YlSUsZAqursFXsmTmk3qB27Qfbb1K/kFjJLbayJ26wxP9x54U Az43mgugvNsPz1CR15hDrNtk02GyVoRAGUk7J6HTSnu+Ow6X9VG6iD/RltTSrHkRd3t4 qUp6dlk32dMmXOY1h+gYEXAlKby/reqCb0Ww4MlvyHSY7PUTNYW0JPMhNsQM+DLy1EnC MULg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tqVojdobICDatFdrmRU+JZR5kZqCnzb6fyHjN69jtq4=; b=LNN7YBu8S951M6BDXf7875doHGltDU0e7PNL9SuZ+OA+ukWo1lIekuqQqc6PHEufS1 amRZdWIqvB3x3aZOdqXmtEfCF/CPfngbo++kMMSoOweBLlbe1VO5Nj3mQIrljgt+BnLh ep+JoqnNHDlLMExm8AGj9qeacaU2bTBVPYYywQEA3B2Urye6v/hOh1Q6MpmQkLp9tse7 VtfPdjihw1Bc/oX+9mmLRqUdp3rTDfXznuqEd95Y0wbfFoUISxDxr9FFU08Wb85x67Xb A4tYoj34/MyJe3D1CJXDlhXWac00ymtxEud9t6qryXt8VOgc84O2NpseM6/YYu7tGfZw 6UIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Yzwl9Nga3eLT3K/Ltc0KMbfE1/IMDcLE4XmyNzHol/3/8hvID 3GPZNJJJOTuO4+eLMESuKLIvGweM+4t7Ui6+7w1mjznt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrEEUAnS1MaSQdssbI8BgoJ/gSD0ByGOt+huKTEm6r7enu2mKCvk/HdxNy6A21QkXHSLmVFVrcQc+g96dsF4Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5089:: with SMTP id a9mr3406175wrt.147.1589970761722; Wed, 20 May 2020 03:32:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 20 May 2020 03:32:41 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e1b203df-4f99-dd39-9451-b229f9629b93@cisco.com>
References: <158992568960.13432.13347004307272975200@ietfa.amsl.com> <e1b203df-4f99-dd39-9451-b229f9629b93@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 03:32:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESswgi8D4M7b771QpSq=7UanNP8m6PDa=s7L_+a9D+jrYkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000074b0a805a611eaaa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/GwdEO8VHGji2yGaiDaieqkg4Z6Q>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 10:32:45 -0000
On May 20, 2020 at 4:38:54 AM, Peter Psenak (ppsenak@cisco.com) wrote: > Two editorial nits: > ** Section 3. Editorial. s/ When a router propagates a prefix between ISIS > levels ([RFC5302],/When a router propagates a prefix between ISIS levels > [RFC5302],/ I must be missing something, but what's the diff between the original and proposed text? The “(“ …. I think others may have commented to add “)”. Either way should work. Thanks! Alvaro.
- [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Alvaro Retana
- Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Roman Danyliw