Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Wed, 09 December 2020 12:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E881B3A1007 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:43:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W4_02oJDq2_d for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:43:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 591CD3A0FFD for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:43:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2353; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1607517837; x=1608727437; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xq3NlTOrGWw9SUB1aaUQuabr3vJ5zuwudO13HUviJ98=; b=LdNCKYHy07M6ArNU5wZhgbuaM5Nw6YI+1MbB7UNSukYzisfNuzgTHiEg Zz4iKmXreTwc2j/QF8sbxy+QUen5OaebT1TvQycm+TkAmhVsngpLY7SQ+ Xle8ZvBdXEnV6Vmfd/jAm2xVwyCPSI6EPcqFsuqs7Z3qAqYkKitPstUCA Y=;
X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BpAQDTxdBflxbLJq1iHAEBAQEBAQcBARIBAQQEAQFAg?= =?us-ascii?q?U+DH1cBIBIuhD6JBId4CCUDnDMLAQEBDxsUBAEBhEoCggAmOBMCAwEBAQMCA?= =?us-ascii?q?wEBAQEFAQEBAgEGBBQBAQEBAQEBAYY2DIVyAQEBAQMdBhVNBAsRAgIBAQECA?= =?us-ascii?q?h8EAwICRgkIBgEMBgIBAYMiAYMGrBJ2gTKFV4NmgUKBDiqNXoFBP4ERJwyCZ?= =?us-ascii?q?T6CXQSEdIJfBIMnMnBHOgMUGQEOYJtCimWRM4J+gyOYEwUHAx+DJIolhSyPQ?= =?us-ascii?q?oYTjWmcVIR3gW0hgVkzGggbFTuCaQlHGQ2OOx2GEBOHcEADMAI1AgYKAQEDC?= =?us-ascii?q?YpcAQE?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,405,1599523200"; d="scan'208";a="31706863"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Dec 2020 12:43:53 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.52] (ams-ppsenak-nitro3.cisco.com [10.60.140.52]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0B9Chqxt024816; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 12:43:53 GMT
To: Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
References: <777B2AC4-CACF-4AB0-BFC7-B0CFFA881EEB@cisco.com> <88ecf32fdb4142fbab23f4700335a504@huawei.com> <7b966115-5c34-64e0-8d04-44ac0eb3324e@cisco.com> <6855c46eed1846a2b6db6ff8c4cbd5ea@huawei.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <6464cc14-2813-3db3-8ec4-94946aa2b995@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:43:52 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6855c46eed1846a2b6db6ff8c4cbd5ea@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.52, ams-ppsenak-nitro3.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Hi9ILKc6A6RzH50kPtac0TBYSeU>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:43:59 -0000

Hi Zhibo,

On 09/12/2020 13:05, Huzhibo wrote:
> Hi Peter:
> 
>      If Ti-LFA can protect IP flexalgo, the native IP and SR must share the same algorithm ID.

that is correct.

thanks,
Peter
> 
> thanks,
> Zhibo
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Psenak [mailto:ppsenak@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 7:16 PM
> To: Huzhibo <huzhibo@huawei.com>om>; Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>rg>; lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01
> 
> Zhibo,
> 
> On 09/12/2020 11:50, Huzhibo wrote:
>> Hi authors,
>>
>> Here are some comments about IP flexalgo as follows:
>>
>> 1.In Flex-Algo draft, there is description about using fast-rerouting
>> with Flex-Algo for SR-MPLS and SRv6 data plane. It is recommended that
>> similar text be added for IP Flex-Algo.
> 
> there is a similar text in section 8, but more work is required indeed.
> 
> One important note - TI-LFA requires some form of traffic steering. This can be achieved by enabling both IP and SR flex-algo and use SR FA only to protect IP FA, similar to protection of "unlabeled" traffic with SR MPLS. Or some alternative mechanism for enforcing the traffic on the LFA path is required.
> 
>>
>> 2.Is Application-Specific Link Attribute (ASLA) MUST be used for IP
>> Flex-Algo path computation?
> 
> yes, the flex-algo application uses Flex-algo specific link attributes as defined in base flex-algo draft.
> 
> thanks,
> Peter
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Zhibo
>>
>> *From:*Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Acee Lindem
>> (acee)
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 2, 2020 5:13 AM
>> *To:* lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
>> *Subject:* [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms
>> (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01
>>
>> This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on
>> use cases and deployment prior to IETF 109 and there was generally
>> support for WG adoption. This begins a two week WG adoption call.
>> Please indicate your support or objection to WG adoption on this list
>> prior to
>> 12:00 AM UTC on December 16^th , 2020. Also, review comments are
>> certainly welcome.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Acee
>>
> 
> 
>