Re: [Lsr] Split was Re: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110

 Adding John (AD).

    On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, 10:45:07 a.m. EDT, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote:  

 From: Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com>
Sent: 21 May 2021 00:03

<I should have sent this a few weeks ago when it got done>

FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's been submitted to the RFC Editor.

<tp>
Two months have passed and I see no change in the RFC Editor queue.  Whatever was done would appear to have been not enough.  I was expecting an action by the AD to be required and have seen no sign thereof which may be relevant.

Tom Petch

Regards,
Reshad.

On 2021-03-22, 3:30 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Yingzhen Qu" <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

    Hi,

    I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD module, so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.

    Thanks,
    Yingzhen

    > On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Reshad Rahman <reshad=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
    > Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
    > To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
    > Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
    >
    > BFD WG,
    >
    > Draft minutes have been posted @ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
    >
    > Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
    > <tp>
    >
    > I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can progress.
    >
    > Tom Petch
    >
    > Copying the LSR WG.
    >
    >
    > Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
    >
    > Regards,
    > Reshad.
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Lsr mailing list
    > Lsr@ietf.org
    > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr