Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-02.txt

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Mon, 03 September 2018 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581A5130E1E; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 06:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2G37uMESJRrC; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 06:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 609541277C8; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 06:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2807; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1535982110; x=1537191710; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=BrmBM50sc397AwdKHX6yBmoBplnSim5UBvuqIOkMbAA=; b=SDBnhZDE5DoNkpO3S1YznEAHw7fRkRgdqubjHGmLrD3xf6KQd29kHz+e RI8zMOoGEk32aJcNrlSyNFN7l8zck+rPGeE3wWfkFB1I2l7mFOjMSmD/k yWeJNV5i7fiKSXFyxOogcrv8NrwvQPK3IiFOl0BY0XmfIFlZRy4JYiMVn I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CdAAD2OI1b/49dJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYNOZX8oCot5jCyCDXiVNYF6CxgLhEkCg0chNBgBAgEBAgEBAm0cDIU3AQEBAQMBATg0FwQCAQgRBAEBHxAnCx0IAgQBEgiDGoIBD6R/iX2KWBeBQT+BEYJeNYMbAQECAQEWgSBNhTICm1YJAoYyiT0fgUBIg2+IYosniBcCERSBJB04gVVwFRohgmwJiwyFPm+LS4EugRwBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,325,1531785600"; d="scan'208";a="446933154"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2018 13:41:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w83Dfn7l018715 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Sep 2018 13:41:49 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 08:41:48 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Mon, 3 Sep 2018 08:41:48 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "i-d-announce@ietf.org" <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-02.txt
Thread-Index: AQHUQ4rS4qR5zYVOLk+AhAMNO+T/WqTekFmQ
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 13:41:48 +0000
Message-ID: <2a978ebef14441d3b9d2a49b6f1db78e@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <153598160571.13413.12585366620454848747@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <153598160571.13413.12585366620454848747@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.124.137]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-7.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/J9Vblbusa0IdaIxAgkOTpvS9dzQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 13:41:52 -0000

This new version addresses recently reported Errata RFC7810 (5486).

   Les

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2018 6:33 AM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-02.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
> 
>         Title           : IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions
>         Authors         : Les Ginsberg
>                           Stefano Previdi
>                           Spencer Giacolone
>                           Dave Ward
>                           John Drake
>                           Qin Wu
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 19
> 	Date            : 2018-09-03
> 
> Abstract:
>    In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial
>    information networks (e.g., stock market data providers), network-
>    performance criteria (e.g., latency) are becoming as critical to
>    data-path selection as other metrics.
> 
>    This document describes extensions to IS-IS Traffic Engineering
>    Extensions (RFC 5305) such that network-performance information can
>    be distributed and collected in a scalable fashion.  The information
>    distributed using IS-IS TE Metric Extensions can then be used to make
>    path-selection decisions based on network performance.
> 
>    Note that this document only covers the mechanisms with which
>    network-performance information is distributed.  The mechanisms for
>    measuring network performance or acting on that information, once
>    distributed, are outside the scope of this document.
> 
>    This document obsoletes RFC 7810.
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-02
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-02
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-02
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr