Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Wed, 20 May 2020 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CA83A085C; Wed, 20 May 2020 03:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6N6lymMXuFJW; Wed, 20 May 2020 03:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66263A085A; Wed, 20 May 2020 03:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=680; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1589972331; x=1591181931; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AfJ8u5Fm6nVgxVjssurWPZvqqUAJBHxElx05q7k9ZAM=; b=ZSqWnrZG9zBf2BJ3f1OHYUWsQ/K5uNqZWAvYcd1KUYDYLJweMdnWizOg IjDKLBP3bhy1cCLGLaipa0GkJm4BsiievOE+9+C+0q7/vj4fbLRHAnV// 4UPc205wS52yjIAHgmxYc/kvVv05wwB6G1E2OcRH++jk/l+UMOWPcQCUO k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,413,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="24045302"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 20 May 2020 10:58:49 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.51] (ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com [10.60.140.51]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 04KAwmXa017811; Wed, 20 May 2020 10:58:48 GMT
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org
References: <158992568960.13432.13347004307272975200@ietfa.amsl.com> <e1b203df-4f99-dd39-9451-b229f9629b93@cisco.com> <CAMMESswgi8D4M7b771QpSq=7UanNP8m6PDa=s7L_+a9D+jrYkg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <4c476a0a-d01d-6d71-451d-9e4af18d4c3c@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:58:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESswgi8D4M7b771QpSq=7UanNP8m6PDa=s7L_+a9D+jrYkg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.51, ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/JlF96eSMtkKgKF4S3LFtbIZk2ng>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 10:58:53 -0000

On 20/05/2020 12:32, Alvaro Retana wrote:
> 
> 
> On May 20, 2020 at 4:38:54 AM, Peter Psenak (ppsenak@cisco.com 
> <mailto:ppsenak@cisco.com>) wrote:
> 
>>
>> > Two editorial nits:
>> > ** Section 3. Editorial. s/ When a router propagates a prefix between ISIS
>> > levels ([RFC5302],/When a router propagates a prefix between ISIS levels
>> > [RFC5302],/
>>
>> I must be missing something, but what's the diff between the original
>> and proposed text?
> 
> 
> The “(“ …. I think others may have commented to add “)”.  Either way 
> should work.

ah, yeah that has been fixed already :)

thanks,
Peter
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> Alvaro.
>