Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Sat, 22 December 2018 15:53 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5A11277D2; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 07:53:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K0mVWMYj3KQs; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 07:53:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 373A61277CC; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 07:53:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=859; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1545494036; x=1546703636; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fewLI65RvbqL41QeDjvnugdBnoxtNt+7/OFBbKJa2wA=; b=dIWT/UNWMrfVYDzawTQCVGfKd+c4OygsuVs+9R451xyTj1pZw/01ifxF GSy2M9NQKONw+QKoFWjo51xj2jJRVvc2hIp/SZyiwLsZZfQ/rhHEG4kJJ YQFqGG2wp/tHeUFFl6DQ3Ltb3ZjtC1OEln6urfEhWcDWEsyfGmRV0/UZJ k=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,384,1539648000"; d="scan'208";a="9032424"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Dec 2018 15:53:53 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.53] (ams-ppsenak-nitro4.cisco.com [10.60.140.53]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wBMFrrIR017429; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 15:53:54 GMT
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
References: <154398144445.4943.7198735398003216566.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5C079200.1030701@cisco.com> <20181217055358.GC94620@kduck.kaduk.org> <69190220-4994-f9c9-4adf-5016abf3a39b@cisco.com> <03e6354b-c606-fc4a-bbf2-3d59fa1cb774@cisco.com> <20181222042939.GW94620@kduck.kaduk.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <a2d1ea1c-50f3-e468-b5cd-78fb6bfe74d4@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 16:53:53 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20181222042939.GW94620@kduck.kaduk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.53, ams-ppsenak-nitro4.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/L0PfrQJ3F445OV1O2Rgd0QFeMZA>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 15:53:59 -0000

Hi Benjamin,

On 22/12/2018 05:29 , Benjamin Kaduk wrote:

>>> What about the following updated text in the OSPFv3 draft:
>>>
>>> "In some cases it is useful to advertise attributes for a range of
>>> prefixes. The Segment Routing Mapping Server, which is described in
>>> <xref target="I-D.ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop"/>, is an
>>> example of where SIDs for multiple prefixes can be advertised. To
>>> optimize such advertisement in case of multiple prefixes from a
>>> contiguous address range, OSPFv3 Extended Prefix Range TLV is defined."
>
> That's a big help, at least for me; thanks!
> I wonder if the first sentence would be better as "useful to advertise
> attributes for many prefixes at once", but will definitely defer to your
> judgement of that.

sure, I will word it that way.

thanks,
Peter

>
> -Benjamin