[Lsr] FW: IPR Poll follow up on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 21 July 2018 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2EA1292F1 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qZjkmyTdoLs0 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7431A130DDB for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 13:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=25844; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1532205339; x=1533414939; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=cmwxhz+7z9EGmm6k6T2z4XeYvu2xKsLwFY2daagMgHY=; b=P4Ff1xrE99+rdIHJZefLYYjtoq+xJWod1h25yM6CeNuPzt536+F6FmGy evvSc8Y7XZI+QPxLM98WyJrAkf/2e/Wox9to1UmKKpG3ylebU4JXWcw1T XXMCzQ4pof+b/egy63FML98WKCkbpeMV0nyTGJVbMyJe/G4/LW/1qUptB U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ASAgAimFNb/5ldJa1cGQEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJXTCpjfygKg3SUNoIMiDqNF4FmC4RsAheCdSE4FAECAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQECbSiFNgEBAQEDI1YQAgEIEQMBAQEWCwcDAgICHxEUBwEBBQMCBA4FgyA?= =?us-ascii?q?BgRtMAxWuOIEuhF2CMA2DM4kCghaBOIJqglaBYg0YAQE4BhYJgkIxgiQCiFa?= =?us-ascii?q?JIodJKwkCjCKDDIFFhBKIG4gDgxGGZgIRFIEkNCGBUnAVOyoBgj4Jgy0BCY0?= =?us-ascii?q?Tb4wAgR+BGwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,386,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="146686794"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Jul 2018 20:35:38 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com []) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w6LKZb9l018180 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 21 Jul 2018 20:35:38 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ( by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 16:35:37 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 16:35:37 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR Poll follow up on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16
Thread-Index: AQHUITJhkJPhUOUKe0i3lXgBcrSMmQ==
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 20:35:37 +0000
Message-ID: <B07575BA-F9BF-49E9-A52F-E3EE84ED0F76@cisco.com>
References: <CAF18ct49pRuR0_E43m-2pfK6MtnH6Op_J-Nw6BAvFDDa2eoU7w@mail.gmail.com> <79ED960E-DA77-43A1-8764-E466F56F62A1@gmail.com> <39ADDFD9-8137-45E4-9D7B-F7062CDB2F00@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <39ADDFD9-8137-45E4-9D7B-F7062CDB2F00@oracle.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B07575BAF9BF49E9A52FE3EE84ED0F76ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client:, xch-rtp-011.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/LWpWfX53jmyEonoLhAxPdRzHO1Y>
Subject: [Lsr] FW: IPR Poll follow up on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 20:35:43 -0000

Hi Uma,
Here is the response from Ed. Since things were hectic at IETF 102, I neglected to forward it to the list.
From: Edward Crabbe <edward.crabbe@oracle.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 7:56 PM
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant@gmail.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IPR Poll follow up on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
Resent-To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>om>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>rg>, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 at 7:57 PM

Apologies for the dilatory response; apparently there is an issue with list mail on the account listed for this draft.

I am not aware of any IPR related to this draft.

On Jul 18, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Jeff Tantsura <jefftant@gmail.com<mailto:jefftant@gmail.com>> wrote:

Please respond ASAP

From: Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:umac.ietf@gmail.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 3:32 PM
To: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>
Cc: lsr-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:lsr-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IPR Poll follow up on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16

Dear Authors,

Edward C. didn't respond his IPR response (despite multiple reminders).

Per Chris one option is to try few more days (may be his mail ID changed and one of the authors can contact him)  or else  remove him from the contributors list to quickly move forward.

Once that is done, I have to make small update in the write up (regarding the IPR poll status) and chairs can take the next steps.


Uma C.

On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 5:16 PM, Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:umac.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear All,

All authors have responded to the IPR Poll.

Still couple of contributors (as listed) need to respond to the IPR Poll
 - Martin H.
 - Edward C.
 - Rob S.
 - Igor M.
- Saku Y.

Please respond to the LSR list thread.

Uma C.

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:16 AM, Uma Chunduri <umac.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:umac.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
Still need one author's and couple of contributors response for the above subject.

Please respond to  the LSR list thread.

Uma C.