Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-01

["Acee Lindem (acee)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ketan,

From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <[e-mail]>
Date: Monday, October 5, 2020 at 1:29 AM
To: Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg=[e-mail]>
Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, Christian Hopps <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-01
Resent-From: <[e-mail]>
Resent-To: Christian Hopps <[e-mail]>, Acee Lindem <[e-mail]>, Yingzhen Qu <[e-mail]>
Resent-Date: Monday, October 5, 2020 at 1:29 AM

Hi Gyan,

Thanks for your support and comments on the draft.

The proposed encoding for L2 Bundle members and their attributes in OSPF is different than the ISIS encodings in RFC8668. ISIS encodings have “tighter” LSP space considerations that OSPF. The authors have proposed a simpler encoding scheme for OSPF – feedback/inputs are welcome.

You have the bundle member sub-TLVs in the right place for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.

Thanks,
Acee

The list of attributes in Figure 2 and 3 also includes L2 Bundle member Adj SID. Since the encoding scheme is similar to Layer 3 attributes, we can re-use the same sub-TLVs.

Thanks,
Ketan

From: Lsr <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra
Sent: 03 October 2020 04:07
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg=[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Christian Hopps <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-01


I support WG adoption of this draft.

I agree that OSPF needs the functionality equivalent to that defined for IS-IS in RFC 8668.

I think the draft should include similar to RFC 8668 section 3 parallel layer 3 adjacencies 3 similar Sub TLVs mentioned flag for multiple parallel adjacencies.

Also maybe section 4 of RFC 8668 would apply as well to ospf advertisement of L2 bundle Adj sid.

Thanks

Gyan

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 6:11 PM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg=[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
I support WG adoption of this draft.

OSPF needs functionality equivalent to that defined for IS-IS in RFC 8668.



   Les





> -----Original Message-----

> From: Lsr <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> On Behalf Of Christian Hopps

> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2020 5:03 AM

> To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

> Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>; Christian Hopps <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; draft-ketant-

> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

> Subject: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-l2bundles-01

>

> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft:

>

>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-l2bundles/

>

> Please indicate your support or objection by October 16, 2020.

>

> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any

> IPR that applies to this draft.

>

> Thanks,

> Chris and Acee.



_______________________________________________

Lsr mailing list

[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
--

[Image removed by sender.]<http://www.verizon.com/>

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect

M 301 502-1347
13101 Columbia Pike
Silver Spring, MD