Re: [Lsr] OSPF/IS-IS Entropy Label Signaling Drafts

" 徐小虎(义先) " <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com> Wed, 18 July 2018 00:45 UTC

Return-Path: <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02135126BED; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.979, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alibaba-inc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4gq6b5-2otqK; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out0-139.mail.aliyun.com (out0-139.mail.aliyun.com [140.205.0.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AE80130E91; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alibaba-inc.com; s=default; t=1531874721; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=jM76cuTz4Q/cXH3bxMaGpEuZ69qKZ9IqBz6Hsfp1v5Q=; b=dJzfGwi87W7A0YbhDSAshW4JU548XfL4spFWB71OGlCRf2qTtQhLf3OgOCNoccXfCB8Zt5O5iCFjTalmx55nAp2HmbXr9uuwNU9od1y27GPwxO/66OG/pPfQgadDueHw1vOkvf0qJZaP9vgSrbaXOzO8s9xEx/l5SWWdE3Ao8gY=
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R461e4; CH=green; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e02c03309; MF=xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com; NM=1; PH=DW; RN=4; SR=0; TI=W4_5305839_v5ForWebDing_0A930BF4_1531874682710_o7001c4727;
Received: from WS-web (xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com[W4_5305839_v5ForWebDing_0A930BF4_1531874682710_o7001c4727]) by e01l07449.eu6 at Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:45:19 +0800
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:45:19 +0800
From: "徐小虎(义先)" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
To: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Reply-To: "徐小虎(义先)" <xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
Message-ID: <58a4e1cf-e78c-4d11-9dde-a65c2ee16d29.xiaohu.xxh@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Mailer: [Alimail-Mailagent revision 268][W4_5305839][v5ForWebDing][Safari]
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <94B9CD28-E087-4A58-B51C-52A8B7D0715E@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <94B9CD28-E087-4A58-B51C-52A8B7D0715E@cisco.com>
x-aliyun-mail-creator: W4_5305839_v5ForWebDing_QvNTW96aWxsYS81LjAgKE1hY2ludG9zaDsgSW50ZWwgTWFjIE9TIFggMTBfMTJfNikgQXBwbGVXZWJLaXQvNjA0LjUuNiAoS0hUTUwsIGxpa2UgR2Vja28pIFZlcnNpb24vMTEuMC4zIFNhZmFyaS82MDQuNS42La
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=ALIBOUNDARY_25709_5167b940_5b4e8d9f_29bce1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/NZRzaHEVSPbORPLIvPuHB8HJNPs>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] OSPF/IS-IS Entropy Label Signaling Drafts
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:45:31 -0000

Hi Acee,

We will update these two drafts so as to keep the terminologies be aligned with the https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12.txt

Best regards,
Xiaohu


------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Send Time:2018年7月18日(星期三) 05:13
To:draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org <draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org <draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org>
Cc:lsr@ietf.org <lsr@ietf.org>
Subject:[Lsr] OSPF/IS-IS Entropy Label Signaling Drafts


Authors of LSR MPLS ELC Signaling Drafts,  

Now that we have  https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label-12.txt on the RFC queue waiting on a MISREF for Segment Routing MPLS, it seems we should move forward with these drafts. 

However, it seems that we should advertise an Entropy RLD rather than a generic RLD to be aligned with the terminology in the MPLS draft (soon to be RFC). 

Thanks,
Acee