Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Mon, 01 June 2020 10:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127403A0F33 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 03:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EYzPosG0ymnH for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 03:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFD863A0F31 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 03:55:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3158; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1591008946; x=1592218546; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hxM8Nl/fWSoq5E9DGbvR5LW8CZxGzrm3YvRUvTXc4pA=; b=a5maPNFnGtBMZfVC44HJxHYadmcHHFv3FGQ6KgvDNnM8a/8uPjm0ELie xcu27BzA3Yp+SvTaqFWh3E+TjBcIZgFmUXwjSSuRpPl5C+n13+8BNH35C EgqvIZCaG7uqkpgbJ9iC71Kit7VFtSrxnlFJijhKEPSZVBE5/VIMTpom1 I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BWAQBe3tRe/xbLJq1mGwEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BBQEBARIBAQEDAwEBAUCBSoMYVAEgEiyEJYkBiAubdgsBAQEOGAsMBAEBhEQ?= =?us-ascii?q?CgiYlOBMCAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBgRthVkMhXIBAQEBAgEBAQwVFS0JFwQLEQQ?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQECAiMDAgInHwkIBgEMBgIBAYMiAYJcIA+sbnaBMoQ+Ag5BQoM5gUCBDiq?= =?us-ascii?q?MYYFBP4EQASeCaT6CZwEBAgEBGIFvgm6CYASZSpoFgmGCeoU3kDcHHoJmgRS?= =?us-ascii?q?HcwWEY41DkF+JdpQsgWoigVYzGggbFRohgmkJRxkNmUaFRD8DMDcCBggBAQM?= =?us-ascii?q?JjW8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,460,1583193600"; d="scan'208";a="26628545"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 01 Jun 2020 10:55:39 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.51] (ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com [10.60.140.51]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 051AtcXN008805; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 10:55:39 GMT
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
References: <159100094287.10006.5637389500374152632@ietfa.amsl.com> <44240a91d7e246bcad13b0f4da5d52f9@huawei.com>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <1abba73e-cb09-d4a4-da45-dce441a4eb74@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 12:55:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <44240a91d7e246bcad13b0f4da5d52f9@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.51, ams-ppsenak-nitro2.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/Nga9MplyOEcY5f3dD_DdlYJK1zE>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 10:55:48 -0000

Tianran,

On 01/06/2020 12:49, Tianran Zhou wrote:
> Hi Authors,
> 
> I see the following words in the introduction.
> "   Recently, mechanisms have been defined to signal labels via link-
>     state Interior Gateway Protocols (IGP) such as IS-IS [RFC8667].  "
> 
> It's not clear to me what the " mechanisms " are. Could you please add some reference or text on this?

the reference is there - RFC8667.

thanks,
Peter

> 
> Thanks,
> Tianran
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 4:42 PM
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF.
> 
>          Title           : Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy Readable Label Depth Using OSPF
>          Authors         : Xiaohu Xu
>                            Sriganesh Kini
>                            Peter Psenak
>                            Clarence Filsfils
>                            Stephane Litkowski
>                            Matthew Bocci
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15.txt
> 	Pages           : 9
> 	Date            : 2020-06-01
> 
> Abstract:
>     Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) has defined a mechanism to load-
>     balance traffic flows using Entropy Labels (EL).  An ingress Label
>     Switching Router (LSR) cannot insert ELs for packets going into a
>     given Label Switched Path (LSP) unless an egress LSR has indicated
>     via signaling that it has the capability to process ELs, referred to
>     as the Entropy Label Capability (ELC), on that LSP.  In addition, it
>     would be useful for ingress LSRs to know each LSR's capability for
>     reading the maximum label stack depth and performing EL-based load-
>     balancing, referred to as Entropy Readable Label Depth (ERLD).  This
>     document defines a mechanism to signal these two capabilities using
>     OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 and BGP-LS.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/
> 
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-15
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> 
>