[Lsr] [IANA #1109980] Early Allocation Extension for "IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing" - draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16.txt

"Sabrina Tanamal via RT" <iana-prot-param@iana.org> Mon, 04 June 2018 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D59130E0D; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:51:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.931
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.931 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CxSvHtW5b6QY; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.46.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 822C5130E0C; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 15:51:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9909E042F; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 22:51:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6F281C205CB; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 22:51:56 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: sabrina.tanamal
From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-prot-param@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-prot-param@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <6F992B24-F2C5-48EB-AFA0-9E0039E3FAF9@cisco.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1109980@icann.org> <0B952820-E870-4A95-A323-C24D4D393DE9@cisco.com> <6F992B24-F2C5-48EB-AFA0-9E0039E3FAF9@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-22380-1528152716-92.1109980-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1109980
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: sabrina.tanamal@icann.org
CC: lsr@ietf.org, ginsberg@cisco.com, draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org, chopps@chopps.org, uma.chunduri@huawei.com, acee@cisco.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 22:51:56 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/P2lmfLecWmlKl4vfdrLGgDlOYu8>
Subject: [Lsr] [IANA #1109980] Early Allocation Extension for "IS-IS Extensions for Segment Routing" - draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 22:52:00 -0000

Hi all, 

We've updated the expiration date for the following registrations:  

In the TLV Codepoints Registry:

149	Segment Identifier / Label Binding (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	n	y	n	n	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]

150	Multi-Topology Segment Identifier / Label Binding (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	n	y	n	n	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]

In the Sub-TLVs for TLVs 22, 23, 25, 141, 222, and 223 registry: 

31	Adjacency Segment Identifier (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	y	y	n	y	y	y	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]

32	LAN Adjacency Segment Identifier (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	y	y	n	y	y	y	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions] 

In the Sub-TLVs for TLVs 135, 235, 236, and 237 registry: 

3	Prefix Segment Identifier (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	y	y	y	y	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]

In the Sub-TLVs for TLV 242 registry: 

2	Segment Routing Capability (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]

19	Segment Routing Algorithm (TEMPORARY - registered 2016-06-29, extension registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-29)	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]

We've made the following early allocations:

22	Segment Routing Local Block (SRLB) (TEMPORARY - registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-04)	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]

24	Segment Routing Mapping Server Preference (SRMS Preference) (TEMPORARY - registered 2018-06-04, expires 2019-06-04)	[draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions]

Please see
https://www.iana.org/assignments/isis-tlv-codepoints

Best regards, 

Sabrina Tanamal
Senior IANA Services Specialist

On Tue May 15 17:12:25 2018, acee@cisco.com wrote:
> Hi Amanda, et al,
> 
> I just communicated with Les, one of the designated experts for the
> IS-IS TLV 242 registry, and the draft requires two additional Sub-TLV
> allocations:
> 
> Sub-TLV 22 for Segment Routing Local Block (SRLB)
> Sub-TLV 24 for Segment Routing Mapping Server (SRMS) Preference
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
> Date: Tuesday, May 15, 2018 at 10:54 AM
> To: IANA <iana@iana.org>, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
> Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "lsr@ietf.org"
> <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org"
> <draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>, Uma Chunduri
> <uma.chunduri@huawei.com>
> Subject: Early Allocation Extension for "IS-IS Extensions for Segment
> Routing" - draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16.txt
> 
> Hi Amanda, et al IANA, Alvaro,
> 
> For a variety of reasons, we will not finish the subject draft by the
> end of June when the IANA allocations expire. It has just completed WG
> last call but there are many fastidious reviewers are in the path to
> completion. Please extend the allocations and add any that were not in
> the original early allocations. For example, we need the SRMS
> Preference allocated in the TLV 242 registry ASAP since we have early
> allocations to make in this registry.
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee