IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03

Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Sun, 07 March 2021 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tonysietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B213A17AF for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 07:34:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ty3Vm2TeJImo for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 07:34:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8D233A17AD for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 07:34:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id a7so7254948iok.12 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 07:34:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=frFtZnzTy1z6Afzq9vzIQ1ENSl7AQ1VASnzH0PICJps=; b=vdTCTwKi0IcEvO8Zvskgw7IUXFbaIEFO17u4TT0SUFFJTEQdH+xfKpccfQ5i8a/00j i5AHQ2NBV/SDS2aVe2MxM9LV14chKiioGvgeA6NQP82A7Yon9cSQpBNitWa3lcabKLQl d6WEKzeZ29p6DGqxVJYqLnxTxVtFb32EAcaXekXj3C9A3CJqOKyol6BJeMhJJlHLG9zg Vs1VJIJbX18GCKm0HfMw6SP0mSlfTnNxF/BZ9eRw3HKv150H4ydVzKnKEMoN/7i0SiAl BddzZWdnYY4cYirNLhgJCzdGYmpVtiYawMFtBAzxOyEyr3pGbBwOkO4iO+jQrgHrSgbq 87tw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=frFtZnzTy1z6Afzq9vzIQ1ENSl7AQ1VASnzH0PICJps=; b=OgaN/Fp/OnTlDl+SWFKWiM1R7v3ZrwoWOGFaqLN/XEqG+0jjsYIrZ0RVqx+Aqhzn5u 1DaaTn5qGkA+fbtBKqSD71jkyaIhmvaBpQXr+Q8Tn8W/KLA7ctVw6emrd1JisGelWq6F S3OZDv3mslBQKMLyBcQWv9bAnSLRL2BM0LXugFjGJ83KLK96xY2siAM5Nc5qRM2499rm Li7nkmLEH2gHNHdUfnLi1TaXihCPej62ntEURHSD4CpcxJGGt8SLTIFg13j5R6kk1PqB xRyscYdMz92N6RfSFX7hCEGCKoPCv4ZpApkSNkc1BJwTObmAiU9OoypaQF74ohS+1owV i3+g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530WDbcvHoZI11c+wLuARQrs3d7iV/HpkggEmS9cQzIuxdb+JOkX aSJPmpovT9zKVsSuIHiDJ4/tUD43t+wdpu0nLtE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQv5gDNVMEGvPpgWM6n4ES2JtiJELVDVaDvGgiy8NIzWjbVp58oqwzkh7LeuWne7TFc9+GbYh8d459pp7qjP4=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:ec14:: with SMTP id c20mr11453604ioh.122.1615131273400; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 07:34:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6413094C-F1D8-4DBF-B365-E943473FDDE4@cisco.com> <BY5PR11MB433727F6D0A365B26896625DC1979@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <2021030421033728661450@foxmail.com> <BY5PR11MB43378320E0607268CA22A900C1979@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHL4ritC6x_STU4YqaXCqaWPnOZqAS8XSXiDzEGjfb35w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMHL4ritC6x_STU4YqaXCqaWPnOZqAS8XSXiDzEGjfb35w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 16:33:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+wi2hOcWh0UFJB4BMta6X9_Kv9c0Dpu3ZUbGQV324p5UYu7oA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d1132f05bcf40d6f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/PMSNWJhr74tZmeG9fsPx7aCmsYo>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 15:34:38 -0000

Robert ruminated:

>
> That said I think perhaps we are indeed missing LROW WG (Local Routing
> Operations WG) where just like in GROW WG where mainly (Global) BGP
> operational aspects are discussed there could be good place to discuss
> operational aspects of link state protocols deployment and use cases. In
> fact perhaps it would also free some LSR bandwidth to really focus on
> protocol extensions.
>
>
+1

IGPs grew a zoo of horns and bells by now and no'one tells the operators
which spines are poisonous ;-)

--- tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email