Re: [Lsr] I,Scope of FIT Capability: a node or a link?

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 06 April 2020 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86303A0763; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=KdSECr6E; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=mPovOztm
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ltdBMhiAIspv; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD193A074B; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10511; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1586199252; x=1587408852; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=UTXful6CxzlnsE17nuvvoYmt4jfr3Edx2qd+XhWxHQ4=; b=KdSECr6EPAu1uiYmsJQ0DXQg8blt1JAgdbP4RZj5BQ8T1kxYvVGweXaf kderk5lIME6eKJpBAC4TEBu8i3SNJ+mGaRPplSMIOY6kJjKHeO5bXlCHb aBdNEuemmFWFe5hl//hiH+ohx97LAoVDKz8Xt2JYXkhMDTWEogdsZayoK I=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:M72BNxJG6qFazQO+5dmcpTVXNCE6p7X5OBIU4ZM7irVIN76u5InmIFeCuKd2lFGcW4Ld5roEkOfQv636EU04qZea+DFKa5lQT1kAgMQSkRYnBZuMAkD2BPXrdCc9Ws9FUQwt8g==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D1AACMeote/4gNJK1mGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBgXuBJS9QBWxYIAQLKgqEEYNFA4poToIRiW6JT4RhglIDVAoBAQEMAQEYAQoKAgQBAYREAheCMiQ4EwIDAQELAQEFAQEBAgEFBG2FVgyFcAEBAQEDAQEQER0BASwLAQ8CAQgRAwECKwICAh8GCx0IAQEEAQ0FGweDBAGBfk0DLgEOpgMCgTmIYnWBMoJ/AQEFhTgNC4INAwaBOIwzGoIAgRABJxyCTT6CHkkBAQKCAwaCbDKCLJBJO4YEmVJICoI9km+EOxYHgk6IOJB8jzeLYpBDAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFXcBU7KgGCPlAYDY4dg3OFFIVBdAKBJ40VAYEPAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,352,1580774400"; d="scan'208,217";a="742850771"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 Apr 2020 18:54:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 036Is4iH003911 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 6 Apr 2020 18:54:04 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 13:54:04 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 14:54:03 -0400
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 13:54:03 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=NktUdDhpLItnjto/eGu7K49CY42HQ2AP9J0iLliEuOMRKmMS+TtiSHQAiWLE3y42SW0z3aWFGo04Xd8NiCHuqZvJv6+td66/iSigSNc+alNXxdOIcjNmV6R9mTZQn0k288Xbgrsdt+LRuLgDzPylyDm0+90cXy5zgcOUD5pTj5C8hln6BqIerKrrUIYmyucRD60ipVMVnUed+0GqcQrcIxs4eLZT0OACdFaQ7YQ23LPwj7kuWlRmyfyGyu1sYhwWp0EJZfSVWqvk3xRoSBOnTStNTyCBydnj1ysTfB6r3TO4bIFlnYB2UYL1tiKE8CcSYcIwuVq8nCqd7TsCzIbGQA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=UTXful6CxzlnsE17nuvvoYmt4jfr3Edx2qd+XhWxHQ4=; b=cWTqurMA6APxXnSE4SvVT6WOQOtstqSUP9hvoyQSSYFrfbltIuwLkZQrURaNUP68mYwu6wWoraWXMvtcb9By3RBjWE7Pdd1bno7IKLufXH8ZeGdFowHNC43/NcCLdoOGw0I7TQzgBJCJKHuHtcedHoKisAvTF5QBKudD3++Q5hnrftVlq5h7oA1fMEEMlB+hCj2e9Opp64VEY8dheHGmyizLBGhBkcJEfQrgsKypjL5AuGMRauOYqAiNBDvvB89UYJ3P6ceDiS4FYi8VTVaOMohj3ESN28oJDMjGWpgnUN8AP5x1j934ms9bZ/SHreJMbSYrUd03zx4ZMhZyU4lb3Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=UTXful6CxzlnsE17nuvvoYmt4jfr3Edx2qd+XhWxHQ4=; b=mPovOztmYx6tsmF7plgePbx1d4J1dOhLOxc/JXMN5oNuiXB9Yqniaeq28sC8clZ+Cx98r2btDBLVaCGt38XrNB0FoSnCAXsQ6pvuC6RqAUncPwC4ebpJN9VP2Z0e9mqgxAty8VpRoH7N9QPxnXQFCUQ0Z8biA5k83UV6M8AWiBg=
Received: from BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:8f::13) by BN8PR11MB3748.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:86::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2878.16; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 18:54:02 +0000
Received: from BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::55b2:c415:675f:5fb7]) by BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::55b2:c415:675f:5fb7%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2878.018; Mon, 6 Apr 2020 18:54:02 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
CC: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, "draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework@ietf.org" <draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "draft-wang-lsr-ifit-node-capability-advertisement@ietf.org" <draft-wang-lsr-ifit-node-capability-advertisement@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] I,Scope of FIT Capability: a node or a link?
Thread-Index: AdYMISbJWe8h8bS0Rki6HVv232b2lQAA0obAAAHnLQAABW3UgP//wtuA
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 18:54:02 +0000
Message-ID: <E5C8EB76-815D-43DF-B1CF-20D1E315899B@cisco.com>
References: <4da3d82b084343bfa18de192b1f390b1@huawei.com> <MW3PR11MB4619DBDBD80BC52A92F51176C1C20@MW3PR11MB4619.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <BFBEF91A-7FD0-494D-A69F-0F9319EAD2C7@gmail.com> <881907b7-420a-4fe2-bb71-722d1f50daf8@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <881907b7-420a-4fe2-bb71-722d1f50daf8@Spark>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.133.70]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: afddea6a-d6e9-4501-b33f-08d7da5bdf74
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR11MB3748:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR11MB3748B269A311F15C50A793ABC2C20@BN8PR11MB3748.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0365C0E14B
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(346002)(376002)(110136005)(316002)(5660300002)(71200400001)(54906003)(6506007)(33656002)(2906002)(26005)(478600001)(4326008)(966005)(2616005)(6486002)(8936002)(186003)(53546011)(91956017)(66446008)(76116006)(66476007)(36756003)(81156014)(86362001)(64756008)(81166006)(6512007)(66946007)(8676002)(66556008)(142933001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: SlXW0TZWjLZAGccE9MAtgTKT1MVQDD6AqStkt4Dt5nleN9q4C7rV08pMfMK3TEnha41LTz7lkhryHb5baK+2N9B1KO4wRj8ZEhmL+j0YUXQ3HtL6f8v5ml9dVSkMtEnFAsKtaasau1T3TK89Je7i1w==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E5C8EB76815D43DFB1CF20D1E315899Bciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: afddea6a-d6e9-4501-b33f-08d7da5bdf74
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Apr 2020 18:54:02.0461 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: rapxnnFq2sDyWScbRYLjsH/5CFcKk8f+1VpOWYkyn4a37KefeGVZ9oc1A297iG+i
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR11MB3748
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/R2qeNFrHoQEaL4NkBrNInM6SfO8>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I,Scope of FIT Capability: a node or a link?
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2020 18:54:17 -0000

Speaking as WG member – It seems that additional IFIT-specific information is required to make this useful and the IGPs are certainly not the case. Additionally, the point was made that an IFIT specific information channel would anyway be required to provision the telemetry generation.
Thanks,
Acee

From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, April 6, 2020 at 2:33 PM
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, "draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework@ietf.org" <draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>, "draft-wang-lsr-ifit-node-capability-advertisement@ietf.org" <draft-wang-lsr-ifit-node-capability-advertisement@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] I,Scope of FIT Capability: a node or a link?

+1
Please do not take my comments about link vs node capabilities, as support for the solution, they are semantical.

Cheers,
Jeff
On Apr 6, 2020, 8:58 AM -0700, Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>, wrote:




This discussion is interesting, but please do not ignore the considerable feedback from multiple folks indicating that this advertisement does not belong in the IGP at all (regardless of scope).
My opinion on that has not changed.


+1

IS-IS is not the correct place to implement Service Discovery mechanisms. The management plane already has ample mechanisms for service and capability discovery.

Tony


_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr