IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

Amanda Baber via RT <iana-prot-param@iana.org> Tue, 07 July 2020 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3449C3A0AAB for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 13:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gVqSISs690F9 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 13:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D29933A0AA8 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 13:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A05E0116; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:54:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id E2DCB2043B; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:54:37 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-prot-param@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-prot-param@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-23523-1594152888-1828.1173602-37-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1173602@icann.org> <MW3PR11MB457075D951B2EAD4E765BE6DC16F0@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <A1585595-0C7F-4457-B0B0-5B5E3B5F3767@cisco.com> <rt-4.4.3-19904-1593637843-1345.1173602-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-30607-1593829373-412.1173602-37-0@icann.org> <MW3PR11MB45708CD2B8FAB43A75F50E89C1690@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <rt-4.4.3-6634-1594007162-1963.1173602-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-29704-1594055654-1623.1173602-37-0@icann.org> <B40590DC-81D4-4664-93E5-6989844F37ED@cisco.com> <rt-4.4.3-23523-1594152888-1828.1173602-37-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-3299-1594155277-1163.1173602-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1173602
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
To: acee@cisco.com
CC: ppsenak@cisco.com, mrajesh@juniper.net, lsr@ietf.org, ketant@cisco.com, gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, alvaro.retana@futurewei.com, acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:54:37 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/SzVKPQO1E353_LjqswOaOH-7Ayc>
Subject: [Lsr] [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 20:54:40 -0000

Peter, should we go ahead?

thanks,
Amanda

On Tue Jul 07 20:14:48 2020, acee@cisco.com wrote:
> Gunter is on vacation...
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> On 7/6/20, 1:14 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-param@iana.org>
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ketan, Peter,
> 
> I believe we're waiting for Gunter to approve as the remaining expert,
> but we can move ahead if Peter confirms that we don't need to wait.
> 
> Best regards,
> Amanda
> 
> On Mon Jul 06 03:46:02 2020, ketant@cisco.com wrote:
> > Hi Amanda/All,
> >
> > I thought that there was an agreement to assign bit 0x00000010 for
> > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode and 0x00000020 for draft-ietf-
> > lsr-
> > dynamic-flooding?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ketan
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >  From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-prot-param@iana.org>
> > Sent: 04 July 2020 07:53
> > To: Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>
> > Cc: Peter Psenak (ppsenak) <ppsenak@cisco.com>; mrajesh@juniper.net;
> > lsr@ietf.org; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant@cisco.com>;
> > gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com; aretana.ietf@gmail.com;
> > alvaro.retana@futurewei.com; acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org
> > Subject: [IANA #1173602] Re: IANA early allocation request for draft-
> > ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
> >
> > Hi Peter, all,
> >
> > > > For both Peter and Gunter: the Flooding Request bit registration
> > > > is
> > > > described in the registry as a temporary allocation, but this may
> > > > have been an mistake The RFC 7120 temporary early allocation
> > > > procedure is meant for registries that require RFC publication
> > > > for
> > > > permanent registration. In theory, if the experts agree,
> > > > permanent
> > > > registrations can be made in Expert Review registries at any
> > > > time.
> > > > Would there be an issue with removing the "TEMPORARY" designation
> > > > from that registration?
> > >
> > > please go ahead and remove the TEMPORARY.
> >
> > The "TEMPORARY" designation has been removed from the draft-ietf-lsr-
> > dynamic-flooding registration in LLS Type 1 Extended Options and
> > Flags, currently still assigned 0x00000010:
> >
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/ospf-lls-tlvs
> >
> > thanks,
> > Amanda
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email