Re: [Lsr] [spring] IETF 106 - SPRING agenda

Tarek Saad <> Thu, 07 November 2019 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D4E120950; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:13:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.397
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_SBL=0.5, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ci3yXHQybXxZ; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B7DB120943; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id i12so1392976ybg.2; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 11:13:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=91Ht8A6C5ZZRhqQGLIHdgFKCpUGXjZZxRmvvwR3706k=; b=Rsknb5cQz3tTM5oNRshUjFZJbn62RHHzCMovGE8MliDkhR56PsJ3eZU/IAtq3mgD3J GiIbt/ww6f/9kvu1afloMHvkqKFTRhXFZy3A3J6NVDNAeb0Cr99HdiaUhzxavdQ5ONck SkZky/Rmsk/cdksds2jHB2QxroQBr2tfOhPaTfC2jTMzqR7ROFY+bITNekTyqT8+ksfS TBmjRcOknIfqZCfh7eu9xHEbxf3sLvy84PsBQpoK420AKSi4OTkeMKkVq0UGg4gGbNRM FYU3Tjz/o42EGpszVzA/CZ2NJSky33IE61dXUubQHDfSZeGC4Nt78QCH2SpLkbvC+9UC dB8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:mime-version; bh=91Ht8A6C5ZZRhqQGLIHdgFKCpUGXjZZxRmvvwR3706k=; b=Cnt05HQDqoVhmY8WtYmZF/b0e061/U6Y5QQcpdQgXLJFWYXOtnAoTyf9YBCNuKLFvw 2XlBqCfhtJdTGoFLNqCwDFLxsvl/TQywY3rTd5AJjlb7kx3gl2qvpd3N/Xc0AhxwGc9Y gOy9XX9wtfEX1jAILE7q6dgP4NHaXxukLUtkgRSU48ZYKd4YCwiD2J/QrEk46fN2/5ek NFfetmhV2cG6VmA+ASQxX82el3c+lUXUYCViT42acAv95Q4avrMGhg6eAKzhFpNG7Oxb Q5TTb8qdVcaRNCKiWiZACQebqW6imf0pujnXjDm+KK5YCZ4cziSBgUKdT80vNgwkfZRX aS7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXdfKHtrPc9ZegtMW5c1vPrgFt9RimIi5eud9nm28cFPXP7hYtN UpCftyBao9vJ9S2A5DBJil8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzIipEv6hboy/0LJKW5IaqFcIUYgK99jJ7YtJ9a5LUslQHWqDbq/ucQ/wnhWsZ7LmGS3OxdWA==
X-Received: by 2002:a25:f08:: with SMTP id 8mr5003160ybp.66.1573153983987; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 11:13:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([2603:1036:301:21db::5]) by with ESMTPSA id l207sm2422526ywl.20.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Nov 2019 11:13:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Tarek Saad <>
To: Robert Raszuk <>
CC: SPRING WG List <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [spring] IETF 106 - SPRING agenda
Thread-Index: ATE1ODFfrD4fRGkijgrbDL1LvaayojAwMjEzZ3ZEUzTEA5qndw==
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 19:13:01 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <8966_1571833701_5DB04765_8966_117_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48C61811@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR19MB3689F8DA1025F1DEBC31AB11FC780DM6PR19MB3689namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [spring] IETF 106 - SPRING agenda
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:13:07 -0000

Thanks Robert,

Nothing new on the bgp-ls being able to carry link state ;) -  rfc7752 even states it..
“ .. a mechanism by which link-state and TE
   information can be collected from networks and shared with external
   components using the BGP routing protocol..”

Thanks for sharing your initial thoughts on the proposal.

From: Robert Raszuk <>
Date: Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 4:52 AM
To: Tarek Saad <>
Cc: SPRING WG List <>rg>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [spring] IETF 106 - SPRING agenda

>   Once advertised in the network using a suitable link state protocol

>   (such as OSPF, ISIS or BGP-LS),

Whow ... never imagined that BGP-LS would be called one day a "link state protocol" and an equal sign would be made to OSPF and ISIS.



PS. As to the proposal in draft itself it is clearly possible - but then troubleshooting and operating such mixed network would be a simple nightmare.

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:25 AM Tarek Saad <<>> wrote:
Hi SPRING WG and Chairs,

We would like to request a presentation time slot for
- I-D:
- Speaker: Tarek Saad
- Desired time: 10 minutes