Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 03 December 2020 23:58 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654453A106D for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:58:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkAZ5vypJmFs for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:58:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FF5D3A1069 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 15:58:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id o24so4572663ljj.6 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 15:58:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=74eg1Kn1/VvM181SlLXrPdwWCF8tFGyXzmXVh2yJgpA=; b=QHptw3QfKD0onpdwQILBUoFR1mT+wHowpF22eq/XhL5Kux2DpknNXLCODgD4i2Er9R 4pbNI9TEtAr42elGdrV5dWzoe4PN2i9ANFbbTQrcMdbBnXCBKcdkoy90/M/f2H+PmA1k RoSoEEztGa4djZIgGaxm0uqiLnq0b+QuLzYhfXBo5JWaPpJZ2gWiMn9mbzAlJbnS4wpl u+taCuSLe1V8++K6UmZUX8umcZ6j15zqUNhpzK9+Ros1TPHx73OgLV/8tDoN4L/UDa/d /jqU5e9oQMOF25e4WIri13NRVutIgwLOR1YuPhkBXL0N+8gbDOLv4U1JoN9N4qfx3v4e uJLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=74eg1Kn1/VvM181SlLXrPdwWCF8tFGyXzmXVh2yJgpA=; b=Me7NE66Lf0rUAsuX4VxhcDnIGFjKDjUCxrSR2qErd5Kxmwfww0uTSIG49AzApo+pPH jCCdbF4RhMBchhlLh76srdrHMlwlfe8H44j/PhxCF6AYzRagmu7xqJu6nin47lt7DXsf Vf4fFhWKvD5wPBS//jNpQisnTix5BF4gcEgD7cWsYjRQDDbojT6Ujmrnq7W8mJWfQIRp RJJ8xWGZ+vfcNz+c4wI1920PpMHfo12ZbQfSm4S3p97/8PZHCPbkX2wmKP51rYDdUHjS 3YyzbiqSnhK+YR9IbY+X7gA483SIJoxM1Idxo1Ab/ix0q7AHGcYgl7ach0SCVRxdsQ2M m2OQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AtRWySiBkGA1RPP5WwJfPuR9RdKgHctdfB7CxQgZsGD8pEh5K Issx4ZIYb/g0KC3sePyDzhSbPgY5cFj6zbI+GG70xt1vNSc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyobIOubjikA54H0paT+wWLNStr6MB9z5/T2LdKY9IElbAxJQxRdHA5++XY3ELvdNICZqcgJNPV2Ie4OVWJqHU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:1606:: with SMTP id w6mr2363271ljd.57.1607039933515; Thu, 03 Dec 2020 15:58:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <777B2AC4-CACF-4AB0-BFC7-B0CFFA881EEB@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <777B2AC4-CACF-4AB0-BFC7-B0CFFA881EEB@cisco.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 00:58:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEmmFfN228okgFGM09qaiB8s0nS_8rQEqwBVsdJidy8XA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: lsr <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000060a4bc05b5982460"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/UoZsZTUJS0hnzEjBRBKdytl4uhw>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 23:58:57 -0000

Hi,

I support adoption of this draft.

However I really do not think that what Flexible Algorithm offers can be
compared or even called as Traffic Engineering (MPLS or SR).

Sure Flex Algo can accomplish in a very elegant way with little cost multi
topology routing but this is not full TE. It can also direct traffic based
on static or dynamic network preferences (link colors, rtt drops etc ...
),  but again it is not taking into account load of the entire network and
IMHO has no way of accomplish TE level traffic distribution.

Just to make sure the message here is proper.

Thx,
R.

On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 10:13 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> This IP Flex Algorithm draft generated quite a bit of discussion on use
> cases and deployment prior to IETF 109 and there was generally support for
> WG adoption. This begins a two week WG adoption call. Please indicate your
> support or objection to WG adoption on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on
> December 16th, 2020. Also, review comments are certainly welcome.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>