Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-02

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 25 May 2021 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1A23A142E; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iodPKrEgOCkY; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1C933A1427; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id p39so7676971pfw.8; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=fBPQ5DIh3qkXeXbfEg7PzlpW1K2qP5rGe/n19YGrFoE=; b=CEUY8mre81HIPreeCc4SGOU9tk30rDZOTqgo/q6yiAuWcCTFBpN3ZEVta20LMHh30l xuA+LbGjrynGWLpVh4RGu9J9s2O/+nYuHJV17HXeX7oD+i08Yh9ddMPzW8AaH1RFx04l toCndZo48/+Nz7V5UZ0fLzZhSDp4m8G+imM6SuoTwbQ8DlEB7O5TWDrcNDUjHpbrfW58 e0V1vqNImEyEJtjZ6JMDVEdrPjlDUfyef3T6hstB76iwtebTevxXc6cJmLE9oPtnfqVz r7Bsucf5VJ2dtBYy0oOdnFluWaflQYGxR8WpH0gFT/y0REvUxN5M7yQERf2xjd5kogrk YvKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=fBPQ5DIh3qkXeXbfEg7PzlpW1K2qP5rGe/n19YGrFoE=; b=PwGqS4OM+smEM5+AWjiTVyxSHAMmactCMNdWv2G8AOqGEjnvByr9jdN6AICN7M0LTT YEjhr5FLh2ZZCZILjDo2WNd1JglPOfWMGeFsvZ3Qr4SwHY2xuypetgMYGfNbVdxJYutV yyzfAOPZSuFWBSUMLl1BloYmpmFVRr1f5fbpXVILJIsxK0WZoR3TpWBGW/VCmu95AdWi PGhnsY6C/nrjb1rHI7gCC633ZqB5NV5nzzBb9BgP04t/i3EoBZd55DHTWqxzoRCn4s7Z fdZ2m8CkNQqbFVtz3JtA6abyWr9KhdAi7Nry4PtAjJOjCn3BuJJ3/5mX4TGCtwOxMyRV qRdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530j4EkYUZ4sNGLhLsdTFeGgK5Wn1RztOYEWmbZPeZgQipY9b7dS +opP7/IkT6MudaeTARgximo9a8Bfj8Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyYGcl4MwujeSWOCMJvKWzJYLGH8ACwz78dTgqkag8T03eDxFZRx7Bto1LaXGjGBvYdr8JcwA==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:4ed1:0:b029:2e4:df13:fbd8 with SMTP id c200-20020a624ed10000b02902e4df13fbd8mr22614968pfb.68.1621960246632; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e34sm2344023pjk.31.2021.05.25.09.30.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 May 2021 09:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Message-Id: <A804984E-E6A4-4893-AEA7-F0CA5220DAEF@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3DDA637E-E055-4774-907E-EDC58DBCF7F2"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 09:30:44 -0700
In-Reply-To: <007201d75109$cb3bac00$61b30400$@tsinghua.org.cn>
Cc: Ketan Jivan Talaulikar <ketant@cisco.com>, lsr <lsr@ietf.org>, draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con@ietf.org, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
References: <0BAE6DBA-04A3-4A3A-A1E3-14EFAA0FBE68@cisco.com> <MW3PR11MB4570FB10A5788FDA3BBA6C91C1269@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <AE6570D7-062E-4F8A-92E8-120FA52D4785@tony.li> <007201d75109$cb3bac00$61b30400$@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/VA2abFXEoXs1wd2YTcNMtU6Ic1Y>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Poll for "Flexible Algorithms: Bandwidth, Delay, Metrics and Constraints" - draft-hegde-lsr-flex-algo-bw-con-02
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 16:30:51 -0000

Hi Aijun,

> My suggestion is still not introduce such non-cumulative metric to cumulative based SPF calculation process.

Again, what we’re proposing is cumulative.

Tony