[Lsr] IPR Poll [Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16]

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Wed, 13 June 2018 13:13 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B72130E29; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 06:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5QuMTLzQtcCC; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 06:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8470130E1F; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 06:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tops.chopps.org (47-50-69-38.static.klmz.mi.charter.com [47.50.69.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E0E463354; Wed, 13 Jun 2018 13:13:06 +0000 (UTC)
References: <874lk2vx4n.fsf@chopps.org>
User-agent: mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
To: "lsr\@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org, chopps@chopps.org, lsr-ads@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <874lk2vx4n.fsf@chopps.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 09:13:05 -0400
Message-ID: <8736xqhlsu.fsf@chopps.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/VFFHnwsJ0orgsAo4BrgBrkKT24E>
Subject: [Lsr] IPR Poll [Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16]
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 13:13:13 -0000

Authors,

The original WGLC requested the authors indicate if they were aware of any additional IPR. This seems to have gotten lost in a bunch of comments that followed. I failed to ask again during this second WGLC. So...

Can each author reply to this email (and the list) indicating if they are aware of any *new* IPR on this document. Currently declared related IPR:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-msd

Thanks,
Chris.

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> writes:

> Hi Folks,
>
> We are starting a new 2 week WG last call on
>
>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions/
>
> as there have (*) been some changes to the document since our last WG last call last year. Here's the diff.
>    https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-12&url2=draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16
>
> Will end Monday May 7th.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>
> (*) contrary to what you may have heard from folks at the mic in London. :)