[Lsr] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 11 May 2020 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EEC3A084B; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, acee@cisco.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.129.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <158921254839.9500.17457680660479110887@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 08:55:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/X3Xvi2jdKHRkidANvBhQLvNo8D4>
Subject: [Lsr] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ietf-?= =?utf-8?q?ospf-mpls-elc-13=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 15:55:49 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document. The document is easy to read.

Please find below one non-blocking COMMENTs and two NITs.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

== COMMENT ==

For my own curiosity, is there a possibility that a router receives conflicting
node capability via OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 (assuming that both are running over the
same network and using the same router-ID over OSPFv2 and OSPFv3) ?

== NITS ==

-- section 4 --
The "one" is ambiguous in "the router MUST advertise the smallest one." even if
we can guess that it is not "interface" ;-)

-- Sections 3 & 4 --
Is there a meaningful difference between the "advertizing" of section 3 and the
"signaling" of section 4?