Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03

"duzongpeng@foxmail.com" <duzongpeng@foxmail.com> Wed, 03 March 2021 11:41 UTC

Return-Path: <duzongpeng@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB893A0E0D for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 03:41:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <MEbL_VA4XAWh>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "Message-ID"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MEbL_VA4XAWh for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 03:40:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qq.com (out203-205-221-245.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76C8A3A0E0B for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 03:40:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1614771654; bh=PYRTt/wS4khhahwJZimptxs/YS5rITZi1OlnhROt+XY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References; b=v3L+ezCwTCMejELXwHxm2fhastWq4xGECcj6/SKjzfl+9XeH2GtMzFn0lzukNonIK fV3PqyVX53PDyZi1aSZv7bLZM/F5EH+pM0EfHR6SKCspJmgPVwHQ0WZxsq17tkDhf/ q1oekaifOBZgHoJVfSJxYl/2fgrZBRU4nZzmGmSA=
Received: from cmcc-PC ([223.72.100.30]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrsza5.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id 9E82CEC5; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 19:39:40 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1614771580tnpvf9idb
Message-ID: <tencent_1BCB7C3B6DD86A145191E56750EA3E02EC08@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: NggtViPIjqV6Um0oyixCJ7xQugdRILVslC1TCE2+HWA/Pi11WdaSgbeKy99uYV kDplwBfkRg3PhyYqTQqFm0oj/1dI71mP8efhbvoc+eoGIwB6U71zYXUZkTuZKQ2zqEF0a7gSYfZK 3gIvJxeOkkd7rC8i4KTTUE6sC435lhgLptqw0dyC2lAy9/yjXYl+QmDOQ1AnDEVqVdzXDiL/jeSa /ee9aGTdC7wJUNF5u5iMpV64IBaUKVrvFgLLHfohZ0cz9vvUUxewYLrwoV6WwGpPxxuZIbyXcncw wbHiNzXMPUItczQTUQxUtDWjwMl8HVRexMdy41j8MVy7R6cX0bBXmfFAispDeXE/TFhN5HLyJeV7 who159DPzxSxQEJOnXkjKG7zQnscCp6Y0QwzIZr71pzni5TmEuXnDxPNsEmkO0tZlPBMcXQXDZUT jKPj4RpVyi8kkt4/Ptfyk5ehsKB632Li1r7/zj9BF0c6re4kUZ16zb2cb4zD4KnkJ/ZsXie0v4R0 AYe8NmyN59zsxwY911+6TGa44ksOr9MLdeCGamcD04d4xiUfiSC+FRkDeKFKVIeFSiCD0v+2PMD1 mTo2AY8yf20+9ly8+azKxd9/oGdqdfsr9AquLZqXIpFjJcLPnj+vLigDvL7Oc7Au8ujjIZmvclSY 6GiisNJ+04DHA0t2Um63HJCxctbmMFMq4VvzXaXdSfCWngFnipa9ahMrGrTBChWO5o0ONfT2XQHP q6TrM8MJ3kiFBm/ewA692R02lrdagohCD6ac992R6X3cN5FTQijTt11o0BN1tXflkMbzqArCeGnC YUN+s6qYfyFCy0QvbqUGU3ajOu3nahyGnJJg0aaqjJ99a5oYcURUZZ9bDG5r/W/5255CrP53QyF2 /Y9M7KbIqkcuKXKCQsF8dqWSTB4T0z8/8UktaPB9fNI9JlJ7a414pPyvSamxoX1rCEUAz6dBq4
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:40:55 +0800
From: "duzongpeng@foxmail.com" <duzongpeng@foxmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem \(acee\)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
References: <6413094C-F1D8-4DBF-B365-E943473FDDE4@cisco.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.15.80[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202103031940546194142@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart278448037450_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/YNhbRdXzc1VH6nNHnLuTxmpNevQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] =?utf-8?q?WG_Adoption_Poll_for_=E2=80=9CUsing_IS-IS_Multi-?= =?utf-8?q?Topology_=28MT=29_for_Segment_Routing_based_Virtual_Transport_N?= =?utf-8?q?etwork=E2=80=9D_-_draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03?=
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 11:41:04 -0000

Hi, all

I support the adoption of this document. It is straightforward and reasonable to use MT to build VTNs with customized topology and attributes, and the document is well written. 

Best Regards
Zongpeng Du



duzongpeng@foxmail.com & duzongpeng@chinamobile.com
 
发件人: Acee Lindem \(acee\)
发送时间: 2021-03-03 07:27
收件人: lsr@ietf.org
主题: [Lsr]WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
This information draft describes how MT could be used for VTN segmentation. The authors have asked for WG adoption. 
 
This begins a three week LSR Working Group Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03. I’m giving it three weeks due to the IETF next week. Please register your support or objection on this list prior to the end of the adoption poll on 3/24/2020. 
 
Thanks,
Acee