Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Wed, 20 May 2020 12:36 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601183A0943; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zJXOchZ8FgCk; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 559553A093D; Wed, 20 May 2020 05:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 04KCa7tV015694; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:36:07 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu 04KCa7tV015694
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1589978167; bh=6OS9Yoi0FiETz8+kzcsIpsVuKtuDbZ866QLvnjfE5K0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ndycoNsd30rUu+tW2mVcHI+vT6PBKNmvJOn33lJQgsyq5hggxWULmv7CE+NQJRXG3 Monf29YBuZJz+5f9niquvslzL5XsAfQP7pHvdSrfC+KKB7zNVO2Su43r4R+/BYX+hI Myy40Qe5XUM3hYBols7vOSub6kdcYi2Gi0FGJMyo=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 04KCa6Kk039305; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:36:06 -0400
Received: from MURIEL.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.47) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (10.64.28.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.487.0; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:36:06 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by MURIEL.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1847.3; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:36:06 -0400
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb]) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb%22]) with mapi id 15.01.1847.007; Wed, 20 May 2020 08:36:06 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHWLikR6WedPEPm1EqkbpAbn5I0z6iw6ukA///+rJA=
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:36:05 +0000
Message-ID: <cdb95c5c72f849fca9951541134657f4@cert.org>
References: <158992568960.13432.13347004307272975200@ietfa.amsl.com> <e1b203df-4f99-dd39-9451-b229f9629b93@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <e1b203df-4f99-dd39-9451-b229f9629b93@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.202.68]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/ZZQedxKdEjmlTRdaAOjEqef5ZdQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:36:16 -0000

Hi Peter!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg <iesg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Peter Psenak
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 4:39 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>rg>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: lsr-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc@ietf.org;
> aretana.ietf@gmail.com; Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>om>; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with
> COMMENT)
> 
> Hi Roman,
> 
> On 20/05/2020 00:01, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
> > Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> > this introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Two editorial nits:
> > ** Section 3.  Editorial.  s/ When a router propagates a prefix
> > between ISIS levels ([RFC5302],/When a router propagates a prefix
> > between ISIS levels [RFC5302],/

"(RFC[5302]," --> "[RFC5302],"  There was an extra open "(".

> I must be missing something, but what's the diff between the original and
> proposed text?
> 
> >
> > ** Section 4.  Figure 2.  The text says that “A MSD-Type Code 2 has
> > been assigned by IANA”, but Figure 2 says “MSD-Type=TBD2”.
> 
> the figure 2 has been removed based on the previous comments.

Great!  You already fixed it.  I was behind on the updates.

Thanks,
Roman

> thanks,
> Peter
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >