Re: [Lsr] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd

[Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tal,

 

Many thanks for your comments.

Updated draft has been published for your review.

 

Cheers,

Jeff

 

From: Tal Mizrahi <[e-mail]>
Date: Monday, August 20, 2018 at 23:45
To: <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>, "Yemin (Amy)" <[e-mail]>
Subject: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd
Resent-From: <[e-mail]>
Resent-To: Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2018 23:45:53 -0700 (PDT)

 

Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd 
Reviewer: Tal Mizrahi 
Review Date: 21-Aug-2018 
Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary: 

This document is basically ready for publication, but has a couple of minor issues and nits that should be resolved prior to publication.

Minor Issues:
Figure 1 seems to indicate that the MSD-Type and the MSD-Value are 2 octets long each, whereas according to the text afterwards each of the two fields is 1 octet long.
Figure 2 – same comment.
Nits:
“provisioned..” --> “provisioned.” (extra period)
“Acknowledgements” --> “Acknowledgments”
“capabilites” --> “capabilities”
“the the” --> “the”