[Lsr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 20 May 2020 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC673A0AA5; Wed, 20 May 2020 12:57:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, acee@cisco.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.0.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <159000466381.16821.994893511549433009@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:57:44 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/bKGuFWQoCP3kNeUrCcLn0OftS38>
Subject: [Lsr] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 19:57:44 -0000

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I wasn't clear on where the  thread ended up from the Gen-ART review, but I'm
nevertheless suggesting some text below to resolve the main sticking point.

OLD
If the router supports ELs on all of its interfaces, it SHOULD advertise the
ELC with every local host prefix it advertises in OSPF.

NEW
If the router supports ELs on all of its interfaces, it SHOULD advertise the
ELC with every local host prefix it advertises in OSPF. The absence of these
advertisements implies that advertisement of the ELC is not supported.

Not sure if that matches the intent though.