[Lsr] Flooding Reduction Draft Redux

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Fri, 01 February 2019 12:04 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C682127B4C for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 04:04:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U8mOAb4w9s9X for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 04:04:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88ECC12DF72 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 04:04:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tops.chopps.org (47-50-69-38.static.klmz.mi.charter.com [47.50.69.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF71E6048F; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 07:04:35 -0500 (EST)
User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 26.1
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Cc: chopps@chopps.org
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 07:04:35 -0500
Message-ID: <sa65zu31zqk.fsf@chopps.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/d2q8aDkyHPYnsxpzfjOBUiunW7o>
Subject: [Lsr] Flooding Reduction Draft Redux
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 12:04:39 -0000

We've had the authors of the individual conflicting drafts take a shot at merging their work.

    This has failed.

Here is the full history (which I also summarized during IETF103 as well). I will send a second email discussing this.

 - Jan 2, 2018 Publication: draft-li-dynamic-flooding and drfat-li-dynamic-flooding-isis
   published centralized solution.

 - Mar 5, 2018 Publication: draft-cc-isis-flooding-reduction and draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction
   published distributed solution.
   - mention of centralized solution asserting it is not good choice.

 - IETF 101 (Mar 2018)
   - Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHmT4ytMn4w&list=PLC86T-6ZTP5j_HaBNdfPbgxGIp22cnaWS
   - Minutes: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/101/materials/minutes-101-lsr-00
   - draft-li-dynamic-flooding-02 presented (1 author). at IETF 101
     - Generally well received.
   - draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-00 (4 authors) presented.
     - Serious problems immediately found during presentation -- not fully baked.

 - Mar 18, 2018 draft-li-dynamic-flooding-03 published (1 author)
 - Mar 27, 2018 draft-li-dynamic-flooding-04 published (1 author)
 - Apr 20, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-01 revised
 - Jun 28, 2018 draft-li-dynamic-flooding-05 published (2 authors)
   - *SMALL CHANGE TO SUPPORT DISTRIBUTED ALGORITHM*.
   - Does not specify distributed algorithm only how to indicate one in use, small change.

 - Jul 2, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-02 published

 - IETF 102 (Jul 14, 2018)
   - draft-li-dynamic-flooding-05 presented.
   - draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-02 presented.

 - Sep 12, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-03 (4 authors)
   - *LARGE CHANGE ADDS NEW CENTRALIZED SOLUTION*.

 - Sep 20, 2018 draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction-04 (4 authors)

 - Oct 21, 2018 draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-00 and -01 (5 authors)

 - IETF 103 (Nov 3, 2018)

   - Chairs give direction

     - draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-05 having come first, being well written and not
       specifying a distributed algorithm (merely allowing for one) is the correct vehicle
       to adopt as a base document.

     - Distributed algorithm work (the original basis for draft-cc-ospf-flooding-reduction)
       should continue as a separate document form the base which would thus we have no
       conflicts.

 - In the meantime the authors try and merge work, this fails.

 - Dec 3, 2018 draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 (7 authors)

 - Dec 10, 2018 draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-00 (4 authors)

 - Jan 7, 2019  draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01 (8 authors)