Re: [Lsr] OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-04.txt

Anton Smirnov <asmirnov@cisco.com> Thu, 25 October 2018 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <asmirnov@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07150130E6A for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 09:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.969
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.969 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ff90xt35beAV for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 09:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E06E3128BCC for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 09:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9914; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1540485006; x=1541694606; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=QJnGSIv1/jtmpDusVOvCRLOeh6OOU635YWTVooTGTt8=; b=T1LnTj7i8K1pzmEDFQ9CK6hoku35/Iq0DT6PYtQE41C0b3hi2ZQP45dS ghKv+QmD73OMmytsGvQfcxp1cd+KHhEu63HMS8zEdvuF3XfcogvViC05S bGp/WHUmHfGEE868i6arP90jlowfT1iILEJgseqCGpyvmj71PpkvqtbOu c=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,424,1534809600"; d="scan'208,217";a="7534560"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Oct 2018 16:30:04 +0000
Received: from asm-linux.cisco.com (ams-asmirnov-nitro6.cisco.com [10.55.206.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w9PGU2k4029546 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:30:03 GMT
To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
References: <1E930DB6-2ED9-43A3-8EC7-338DAD1C3803@cisco.com> <AM0PR07MB51370D4B9B2CC026CF730AFDE0F60@AM0PR07MB5137.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Anton Smirnov <asmirnov@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems
Message-ID: <ffd1e97b-cdbf-7668-6929-d19250967f50@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 18:30:02 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB51370D4B9B2CC026CF730AFDE0F60@AM0PR07MB5137.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------BAA32A10A75EAE47D2EF38A3"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Authenticated-User: asmirnov
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.55.206.135, ams-asmirnov-nitro6.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/dreUKhntXMMzRxPSicBYKRVSj6w>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-04.txt
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 16:30:09 -0000

    Hi Gunter,

    we agree with the proposed change and will make it in the next 
revision, probably even rephrase this sentence.

---
Anton


On 10/24/18 12:59, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote:
>
> Looks fine. One item I would like to see changed (or at least discussed)
>
> I have a problem with chapter3 – Para6 – Point 1 :
>
> EXISTING:
>
> If T's destination IP address is from the same address family as
> the computing OSPF instance,*then the tunnel must have been*
> *signaled based on MPLS TE information propagated in the same OSPF*
> *instance*.  Process the tunnel as per [RFC3630 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3630>] or [RFC5329 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5329>].
>
> PROPOSED:
>
> If T's destination IP address is from the same address family as
> the computing OSPF instance,*then *process the tunnel as per [RFC3630 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3630>] or [RFC5329 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5329>].
>
> MOTIVATION:
>
> I do not understand why to restrict the tunnel to be signaled with 
> only info from same OSPF instance. If there is tunnel available 
> (different instance, or even other routing protocol), it should be 
> able to be used.
>
> G/
>
> *From:*Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org>; *On Behalf Of *Acee Lindem (acee)
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 23, 2018 00:25
> *To:* lsr@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Lsr] OSPF Routing with Cross-Address Family Traffic 
> Engineering Tunnels - draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te-04.txt
>
> This begins an LSR WG last call for the subject draft. Please send 
> your comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, November 13^th , 
> 2018. While its only an 8 page document, I added an extra week due to 
> the IETF. Please let me know if anyone needs any more time.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-xaf-te/
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr