[Lsr] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7810 (5293)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 24 May 2018 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37E912EAA6; Thu, 24 May 2018 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PZvKPNsrDlRq; Thu, 24 May 2018 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DD7012EAB9; Thu, 24 May 2018 09:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 81A11B8087B; Thu, 24 May 2018 09:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: jhaas@juniper.net, sprevidi@cisco.com, spencer.giacalone@gmail.com, wardd@cisco.com, jdrake@juniper.net, sunseawq@huawei.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: aretana.ietf@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20180524164131.81A11B8087B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 09:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/dwHbNJY8jYwbn11EDKImpBMruro>
Subject: [Lsr] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7810 (5293)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 16:41:47 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC7810, "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5293

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@juniper.net>
Date Reported: 2018-03-22
Held by: Alvaro Retana (IESG)

Section: 4.5-4.7

Original Text
-------------
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Type        |     Length    |  RESERVED     |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          Residual Bandwidth                   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   where:

   Type: 37

   Length: 4

   RESERVED: This field is reserved for future use

Corrected Text
--------------
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |   Type        |     Length    |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                          Residual Bandwidth                   |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

   where:

   Type: 37

   Length: 4



Notes
-----
In sections 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7, a RESERVED field is in the diagram and the text.  However, the length field of each of these TLVs is 4.  The RESERVED field is thus not present and should be removed in future editions of this document.
===
The discussion in the WG is here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/x5DlcGmwMPf9hvgL6mofNqGpbQA/

--------------------------------------
RFC7810 (draft-ietf-isis-te-metric-extensions-11)
--------------------------------------
Title               : IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions
Publication Date    : May 2016
Author(s)           : S. Previdi, Ed., S. Giacalone, D. Ward, J. Drake, Q. Wu
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : IS-IS for IP Internets
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG