[Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-41: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 15 October 2019 05:38 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08F8120018; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com, lsr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.105.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <157111790671.24660.1831455612145820820.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 22:38:26 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/e6Tr7jsx82HhCLXcZFNHa9-zLCQ>
Subject: [Lsr] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-41: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 05:38:27 -0000

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-41: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thanks for the updates in the -41!
I think that "i-e" in the following got missed, but that can probably be done with an
RFC Editor note, so I'm clearing my Discuss:

     grouping neighbor {
       description  "IS-IS standard neighbor grouping.";
       leaf neighbor-id {
         type extended-system-id;
         description "IS-IS neighbor system-id";
      container instances {
         description "List of all adjacencies between the local
                      system and the neighbor system-id.";
         list instance {
           key id;

           leaf id {
             type uint32;
             description "Unique identifier of an instance of a
                          particular neighbor.";
           leaf i-e {
             type boolean;
               "Internal or External (I/E) Metric bit value";

Also, I think that a spurious 'd' got added into "Routing Information Based".