IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-09

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Thu, 03 October 2019 14:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7883D120048; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 07:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4VtjWmyQM4BL; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 07:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 402D1120020; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 07:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=587; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1570114656; x=1571324256; h=subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=27H2T/hIJI53QJweoWNuObU0KQcpltREXH6h54+pSzM=; b=bgZ+U11Xo6yTl18jf4JG9vNv+V4h1c1WNh+Ot88Lj5ab8LiUT4vw5avp iyNosZDV2wL4B0fE/lCQA0/Y8IMiaCaajALdPYZARjOzp4pqiN3Lpg3EF s73N7kqx25QMJcGIE0+sg0NhuaxhxVnjdvnqbJJ9G1/+n+gQ6BEe2hgUC o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DDAADDC5Zd/xbLJq1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEMAgEBAQGBZ4NeIBKETIkCowoJAQEBDi8BAYRAAoJoOBMCAwkBAQQBAQECAQUEbYU5hUwGIxVBEAsaAiYCAlcGDQgBAYMeggutYXWBMoh8gUiBDCiMJoFAP4ERJ4JrPodRglgEliGXF4Itgi+SYwYbgiqLY4szqASBaSKBWDMaCBsVgyhPEBSQFz8Dkg0BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,252,1566864000"; d="scan'208";a="17589963"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 Oct 2019 14:57:34 +0000
Received: from [10.147.24.59] ([10.147.24.59]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x93EvXx4027724; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 14:57:34 GMT
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc.all@ietf.org
References: <156828311401.16614.6386779752971919411@ietfa.amsl.com> <db33b455-2cd4-00fa-5954-df90c584fb3c@cisco.com> <CAB75xn4PAOmiEyOD1K9R5zGLGNwMpTD_FV3HRNWpD1fthVVJPA@mail.gmail.com> <e9ba0ddd-1102-9495-a30f-4a4b90dec13e@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <ad0fadd0-82d7-ba15-9f2a-099b5a16fce3@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 16:57:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e9ba0ddd-1102-9495-a30f-4a4b90dec13e@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.147.24.59, [10.147.24.59]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/fiDE3xF-cPurGv8t1UaFmHBBSyQ>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-mpls-elc-09
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 14:57:39 -0000

Hi Dhruv,

On 03/10/2019 16:48, Peter Psenak wrote:

>>>> (3) Section 3, Add reference to draft-ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label for the
>>>> definition and usage of ERLD
>>>
>>> ##PP
>>> The Introduction section has:
>>>
>>> "This capability, referred to as Entropy Readable Label Depth (ERLD) as
>>> defined in[I-D.ietf-mpls-spring-entropy-label]"
>>>
>>> Is not that sufficient?
>>>
>>
>> This is good, wondering if this should be a normative reference?
> 
> ##PP2
> I can make that informative.

sorry, I meant to say, I will make it normative.

thanks,
Peter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email