Re: [Lsr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: (with COMMENT)

[Peter Psenak <[e-mail]>]

Hi Roman,

On 20/05/2020 00:01, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc-12: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-mpls-elc/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Two editorial nits:
> ** Section 3.  Editorial.  s/ When a router propagates a prefix between ISIS
> levels ([RFC5302],/When a router propagates a prefix between ISIS levels
> [RFC5302],/

I must be missing something, but what's the diff between the original 
and proposed text?

> 
> ** Section 4.  Figure 2.  The text says that “A MSD-Type Code 2 has been
> assigned by IANA”, but Figure 2 says “MSD-Type=TBD2”.

the figure 2 has been removed based on the previous comments.

thanks,
Peter
> 
> 
> 
> 
>