Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07

Hannes Gredler <hannes@gredler.at> Sun, 02 December 2018 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes@gredler.at>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342B2127B92 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 07:46:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-q9RRnOFKFd for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 07:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from s17286660.onlinehome-server.info (gilfert.gredler.at [87.106.222.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25DEC1252B7 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2018 07:46:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.185] (62-47-218-140.adsl.highway.telekom.at [::ffff:62.47.218.140]) (AUTH: PLAIN hannes, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-GCM-SHA384) by s17286660.onlinehome-server.info with ESMTPSA; Sun, 02 Dec 2018 16:46:07 +0100 id 0000000002D54032.000000005C03FE3F.00002983
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-F3BAE8D4-182C-4E12-9EE8-B97D2864FB6C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Hannes Gredler <hannes@gredler.at>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16B92)
In-Reply-To: <4221EF3E-E369-469D-AAAC-F8DDE24E981E@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2018 16:39:36 +0100
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <4C11ECD7-A061-400A-BEFC-44BC4ED60836@gredler.at>
References: <4221EF3E-E369-469D-AAAC-F8DDE24E981E@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/g3nd7MCZri9Zg-lPQLQ9TQDB8gc>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Routing for Spine-Leaf Topology" - draft-shen-isis-spine-leaf-ext-07
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:46:12 -0000

support

> On 02.12.2018, at 01:54, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> This begins a two-week WG adoption call for the subject draft. As anyone who has been following the topic knows, there are a lot of proposal in this space. However, as WG co-chair, I believe this simple IS-IS extension doesn’t really conflict with any of the other more disruptive flooding proposals. Also, it is more mature and there is some implementation momentum. Note that I’m making every attempt to be transparent and it is perfectly ok to disagree with me. Please post your comments to this list before 12:00 AM, December 16th, 2018.
>  
> With respect to the more disruptive proposals, we are discussing our next steps.
>  
> Thanks,
> Acee
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr