Re: [Lsr] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Tue, 02 June 2020 11:12 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148283A07E7 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 04:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XnNwTO7KJ9Vg for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 04:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90423A07E6 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 04:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stubbs.int.chopps.org (047-050-069-038.biz.spectrum.com [47.50.69.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FB7560F1E; Tue, 2 Jun 2020 11:12:02 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <C952BE83-EF9E-437F-836C-D3221FF533DF@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 07:12:01 -0400
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, IANA <iana@iana.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9A23E44B-9DC4-4EEC-B23A-E4C59C0BE5D4@chopps.org>
References: <C952BE83-EF9E-437F-836C-D3221FF533DF@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/gGvqZDeHt5akBced9lXNaKA_IRo>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Early Allocations request for "Area Proxy for IS-IS" - draft-li-lsr-isis-area-proxy-04
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2020 11:12:04 -0000

Hi folks,

It seems that we followed the wrong procedure for this. The registries in question are Expert Review only and so RFC7120 does not apply. I wanted to send a quick email indicating that our input as chairs is not technically required as part of the process so our email was a NO-OP on that front.

The intent in sending the email to the list was to make the WG aware that the request was being made, so that at least worked.

Thanks,
Chris an Acee.

> On Jun 1, 2020, at 3:46 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi IANA, Martin, 
>  
> We’ve discussed this draft and are going forward with the early allocation request. While there is some overlap with other LSR WG proposals, there is no reason to block all the drafts given that it very unlikely that we will have a combined draft any time soon. 
>  
> Thanks,
> Acee and Chris
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr