[Lsr] Gentle Reminder!!!Re: draft-ietf-isis-te-app: Clarification on Application Identifier bits
Mahend Negi <mahend.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 10 June 2018 02:35 UTC
Return-Path: <mahend.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F12A130DEA; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 19:35:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M9qmvEvH6eDx; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 19:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot0-x234.google.com (mail-ot0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28FDA130DE9; Sat, 9 Jun 2018 19:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot0-x234.google.com with SMTP id h6-v6so20046813otj.0; Sat, 09 Jun 2018 19:35:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gMJjdD3wkBkXQnoJQbfcuvf8QlbeEc0sddJvqCVqmBg=; b=L5HL8CTaV41pLI5szu+YGL442sGaK7OyN05cK7w47zNdDEKA57saLIHOCAQJrGyrPo agchLkV5nJn6JFFJKSdAKIMzu1oqC4YrtvLcwKM1Y1FUB6kzR10t4DlzC0kjw8l6sHH/ n4L3+LqfcFE6uyQ8Zn0exI3vUDa+yvVFVacWVaOghKkEXEYeMzmhfLLrTOYmFTKIH1zK Oxf+ZXF2YUqbapzumQ1AKNMAnZUHNH8UtjnMWLzEaei5wUi+PbIeFnq8rqeRxT9ttJB4 FwRHz+fO8rPsweCnKNPVABNMgfujtP6WgqbcVh0sGGQFAhqgsI4qxu2XSK5Wbtd3OEw4 K/5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gMJjdD3wkBkXQnoJQbfcuvf8QlbeEc0sddJvqCVqmBg=; b=G97uv1yppGKbnuhLRs1KMjDCzDpv1McOwX8FKXMGclaJ3jTbqBGjK+Dugpu7AIPycM DkAYxwYiz1tqmLyl9imDbi2/wHBBBbgTAtgLWOPBG/fy+QcWfh4+8r3LFUXE3XqkT0Ds eld4RwSeLTWVU+TsJ1qxdduDRS8AN+l8LiZuzDTzZRJnZ66aEsJ3ko+VKnn28NVPGBOI WjJXzohvjSTTRuf22AlMRKkjDdxdhFgHdt0n9X0iAyxxE9AAlgkJevvUTXnQiqNGRYAU 8UDBCRGQ1RcNYHYFI1z/rbYIIkA8K4CLVC0TTFQElsuv6B1hj1YvcEO+VqbQ7idyWIKZ M0FQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0Y2Q6dH/6IPNQYksW4CXZflseKEwYWBvWn7g1h+vsWK3qZhgeQ ELIH2jYxwgFxrJy0xNOGBlLq2kEfdwHcsQCaXoo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLnY9OGIOyTN4GRSgM6jgEDrKxn8cTQNCit8g1ET7xwurcpRSnDahRWTN+j60AijR0qy5RP7G7Kax+UalWxMMw=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:36c3:: with SMTP id s3-v6mr6618887otd.292.1528598124472; Sat, 09 Jun 2018 19:35:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Mahend Negi <mahend.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 08:05:11 +0530
Message-ID: <CAM5Nu_xQnne7sQsJxjn+nvJvkBs8qraUxMGF_YVTE6+vYCd3+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-isis-te-app@ietf.org
Cc: lsr@ietf.org, stefano@previdi.net, ginsberg@cisco.com, jdrake@juniper.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000036ae32056e407c8d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/gp-48DhvGT3ngije7prvnb1Huh0>
Subject: [Lsr] Gentle Reminder!!!Re: draft-ietf-isis-te-app: Clarification on Application Identifier bits
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2018 02:35:27 -0000
Dear Authors, Could you please help me with the query. Please confirm about the new bit for SRv6-TE applications. We are working on this draft implementation. Regards, Mahendra On Wed, Jun 6, 2018, 11:49 Mahend Negi <mahend.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear Authors, > I seek few clarifications on "Application Identifier bits". > > As defined in the draft: > > R-bit: RSVP-TE > S-bit: Segment Routing Traffic Engineering > > F-bit: Loop Free Alternate > X-bit: Flex-Algo > > > Am I right, when I say: > > R-bit: For RSVP-TE on IPv6 and IPv4 networks. > > S-bit: For SR MPLS and SRv6-TE applications. > > > I think a bit to be allocated for SRv6-TE applications? > > Not sure about RSVP-TE IPv6 case. > > If you please your opinion. > > > Regards, > > Mahendra > >
- [Lsr] Gentle Reminder!!!Re: draft-ietf-isis-te-ap… Mahend Negi
- Re: [Lsr] Gentle Reminder!!!Re: draft-ietf-isis-t… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)