Re: [Lsr] IRP Poll for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01 (Resent with Corrected Subject)

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Wed, 02 December 2020 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEF23A1273 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 01:50:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yrOezBjvuUdV for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 01:50:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A18E3A126D for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 01:50:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (047-050-069-038.biz.spectrum.com [47.50.69.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 93CAE61668; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:50:55 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <96802546-1A33-47C7-BB2B-A6A9102FBFDC@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 04:50:53 -0500
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5BD660D5-BA8C-4FC0-9F70-98D2E40DF7EB@chopps.org>
References: <96802546-1A33-47C7-BB2B-A6A9102FBFDC@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/gyuD_TGMSFmM2d8HPflNeG93kUc>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IRP Poll for "YANG Module for IS-IS Reverse Metric" - draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01 (Resent with Corrected Subject)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 09:50:57 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01. This draft defines a YANG model for the base work defined in RFC8500 which does have an IPR disclosure.

Thanks,
Chris.

> On Dec 1, 2020, at 4:20 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Chris, 
>  
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-lsr-yang-isis-reverse-metric-01?
>  
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>  
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
> to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing
> list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a
> response has been received from each author and contributor.
>  
> If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>  
> Thanks,
> Acee