IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

"Albert Fu (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)" <afu14@bloomberg.net> Thu, 19 December 2019 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <afu14@bloomberg.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC02E120DCB; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:10:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id suUY-I40cpB7; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:10:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgnj3.bloomberg.net (mgnj3.bloomberg.net [69.191.244.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 318E1120DB3; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:10:26 -0800 (PST)
X-BB-Reception-Complete: 19 Dec 2019 15:10:25 -0500
X-IP-Listener: Outgoing Mail
X-IP-MID: 1315569937
Received: from msllnjpmsgsv06.bloomberg.com (HELO msllnjpmsgsv06) ([10.126.134.166]) by mgnj3.bloomberg.net with SMTP; 19 Dec 2019 15:10:25 -0500
X-BLP-INETSVC: version=BLP_APP_S_INETSVC_1.0.1; host=mgnj3:25; conid=244
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:10:25 -0000
From: "Albert Fu (BLOOMBERG/ 120 PARK)" <afu14@bloomberg.net>
Reply-To: Albert Fu <afu14@bloomberg.net>
To: lsr@ietf.org, chopps@chopps.org
Cc: lsr-ads@ietf.org, draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <5DFBD931010C002A00390756_0_72008@msllnjpmsgsv06>
X-BLP-GUID: 5DFBD931010C002A003907560000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="BOUNDARY_5DFBD931010C002A00390756_0_104733_msllnjpmsgsv06"
Content-ID: <ID_5DFBD931010C002A00390756_0_71946@msllnjpmsgsv06>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/hZS9TEVxvv8d90TU6SThPWTSSjo>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:10:29 -0000

Hi all,

I also support the adoption of the document - we plan to enable OSPF BFD strict mode on all our WAN circuits to avoid extended traffic black-hole that could occur under some failure scenario.

I am not aware of any IPR associated with it.

Thanks
Albert Fu


-----Original Message-----
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> 
Sent: 13 December 2019 17:25
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>; lsr-ads@ietf.org; 
draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode@ietf.org
Subject: WG Adoption Call for draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode

Hi LSR WG and Draft Authors,

This begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft:

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode/

Please indicate your support or objection by Dec 27th.

Authors, please respond indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that 
applies to this draft.

Thanks,
Chris & Acee.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email