[Lsr] IS-IS lite (an aside)..
Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Fri, 08 March 2019 12:22 UTC
Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B347D12865D for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 04:22:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b4SBEuOJLvy8 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 04:22:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D985A1279A1 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 04:22:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tops.chopps.org (047-050-069-038.biz.spectrum.com [47.50.69.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 360F660521; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 07:22:07 -0500 (EST)
User-agent: mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 26.1
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
To: lsr@ietf.org
Cc: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 07:22:06 -0500
Message-ID: <sa6a7i5k13l.fsf@chopps.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/i45lvHyOyuptERE7hMeN2ruGUZw>
Subject: [Lsr] IS-IS lite (an aside)..
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 12:22:10 -0000
tony.li@tony.li writes: >Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> writes: >> >> See TORs are one case .. but there are ideas to run dynamic protocols to the hosts too. I have heard there was even a volunteer to write ISIS-lite to be used on hosts :) > > I would…. discourage that concept. Perhaps Robert is referring to when homenet was considering using IS-IS instead of a brand new protocol (babel) for use in the homenet. The proposed solution for very simple devices (e.g. thermostats or anything w/o much ram etc) was to use the overload bit. This wasn't just for hosts though, but for very small devices that could still serve as simple router for a network behind them. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-mrw-homenet-rtg-comparison-02.txt Christian Franke coded up "tinyisis" in 1500 lines of C code. :) https://git-us.netdef.org/projects/OSR/repos/tinyisis/browse/tinyisis.c Thanks, Chris.
- [Lsr] IS-IS lite (an aside).. Christian Hopps
- Re: [Lsr] IS-IS lite (an aside).. Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] IS-IS lite (an aside).. Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] IS-IS lite (an aside).. Christian Hopps
- Re: [Lsr] IS-IS lite (an aside).. Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] IS-IS lite (an aside).. Christian Hopps
- Re: [Lsr] IS-IS lite (an aside).. Tony Przygienda