IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] Open issues with Dynamic Flooding

tony.li@tony.li Thu, 07 March 2019 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0935812D4E6 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 09:16:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wJgGpfanuUIi for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 09:16:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x444.google.com (mail-pf1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::444]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA7A12D550 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 09:16:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x444.google.com with SMTP id j5so11928691pfa.2 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 09:16:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Cm30U5os3fjp56A1bLEfiUhBVIH6pBqmxJMcnYh7pbk=; b=g2WfMKzPcGjTKLQiYHK1cRIj6jiUZa4I7yDPgWwbp7thuzTkRUMErep8wlxfzd2jkR 7CL4EuAZNMQO89i14tP71ZB3NS2pNZ53VJpiMFZi0E6fE3VxGqhk38mckOfahlNSvour kF+AZnya+4j+Li6Hw7+WKbYf223oNtjP/d2C+BJVH4ZbcYDbQSt3OCmPPtt5O3xCHX/2 X4A+i7WBMPu0ph46DdhsW5gsYQFRKqlbd4gaeKLkdqP3+Hj9vZn9DlNRZ7CA3NN9aMLl z2Edd7OSenFVbxplDWOUMcGe1vvq5aig0yDffVr9naosZ7+IgdoOB8DjTeLaRZUWM9gX ircQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Cm30U5os3fjp56A1bLEfiUhBVIH6pBqmxJMcnYh7pbk=; b=jBmhNwoRIZBe5533tw4f1GrnTdKUyGbmdBwSLOcUpvY1PS26znDEawAWuYiCL+fRGQ g5ON1x6/qP5HgjMaa8degyX676Ff4wz4awM7SVo0G++mJGb0/nXCZed/qYTCYAfWERLe N7AUjdzygELFq6FXAW3VwCky1uQB3X2JaXQ5UulvgYiJRjGHR5TPJT0IWk1ATnYmYdW5 p6XnzWO8R/dP38gPWI/91VbmwTTrEAqDtZjSI5SXBztCvFm3lZ5RMCe/OZEW1PHEfJFW OrN65IJIZnSuaJGZUCm7UhhwlAzJwE8cBtdzon8/o48O7O+23MDqtruzxui1LuvoL/1H MO6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXRqcABo7YTfj744H8VIu/5+qA9dx4r1PYG0kVySaTDa98sQi0x N31l4ha8im5Jy0U+BsjAq2I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyDk/biDITsHho80vzvYi/LXtSQIl2YotWWYpTGDZX6XxAeyo0eNc+nkm8tAPpe/dPlFHygjA==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:160d:: with SMTP id w13mr12134967pgl.85.1551978986898; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 09:16:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.95.80.104] ([162.210.129.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l64sm6972373pga.87.2019.03.07.09.16.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Mar 2019 09:16:25 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
From: tony.li@tony.li
Message-Id: <C723C078-72FD-426C-99F2-F0A494E0E971@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_70F1F16A-98A1-48C0-920B-E3E0886C4D9A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 09:16:24 -0800
In-Reply-To: <2932F33A-1F9E-4C20-A233-E569D8935AE4@tony.li>
Cc: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>, lsr@ietf.org
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
References: <AAD29CF0-F0CA-4C3C-B73A-78CD2573C446@tony.li> <c1adac3a-cd4b-130e-d225-a5f40bf0ef55@cisco.com> <F3C4B9B2-F101-4E28-8928-9208D5EBAF99@tony.li> <be28dbcf-8382-329a-229f-5b146538fabe@cisco.com> <966E5756-8CEF-47F4-8564-E23D38F0743E@tony.li> <c8f40acb-94fe-f42a-aa0a-3a42e0067be8@cisco.com> <7F522B6C-9D28-4533-8ABD-9F492D9AF26C@tony.li> <a33ff3ba-975b-2ef2-93e9-1bc9664fdd5a@cisco.com> <2932F33A-1F9E-4C20-A233-E569D8935AE4@tony.li>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/izUEI3FbyseO9zo15QtpCrdvYMA>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Open issues with Dynamic Flooding
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2019 17:16:32 -0000


> On Mar 5, 2019, at 1:31 PM, tony.li@tony.li wrote:
> 
> Let me propose that we add something to sections 6.7.5, 6.7.9, and 6.7.11 like:
> 
> Addition of temporary flooding should be done with caution, as the addition of excessive connectivity to the flooding topology may trigger unwanted behavior. Routers SHOULD add temporary flooding in a rate limited manner, if not configured otherwise.


Hi,

I haven’t heard any feedback on this.  Can we please adopt this?

The draft cutoff is Monday, March 11.  Could we please incorporate this change and the addition of the pseudonode identifier by then?

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email