[Lsr] OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement - draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-02 (Corrected recipient Email)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 18 June 2018 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8B2130DE3; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id smQGxcYDOczu; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F56A130DE1; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 08:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7010; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1529335805; x=1530545405; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=J+OOHROQ48Ap2OsVPYrFkMIxzeyIuGJp8KpSfXOJft0=; b=dAJtzjk7dr1iV+7CzqezSAeTBdnsKUH+CssBJMFAFjVkvTY2OxlFt8xi TGhu8QMDNokZAPcuCWvI/fm/ld4Y4I3Cx/HFNWeKDk7lviFz5Uta5B4YY H9WpI1dfzLibNmvjvOS0X4dDqPw98u64VzSuv6ZSGGzh8ahkZwPEzLyn/ 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,239,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="131268980"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jun 2018 15:30:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com []) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w5IFU4NJ031632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:30:04 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ( by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 11:30:04 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 11:30:04 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement - draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-02 (Corrected recipient Email)
Thread-Index: AQHUBxk68BPPNfBBpEuluZW3AneEuQ==
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:30:03 +0000
Message-ID: <DFBDA01F-09B0-4117-B7D8-31900DDCD604@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DFBDA01F09B04117B7D831900DDCD604ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/jD7-IDQm9yRHV40-bvGZ3HsK1rw>
Subject: [Lsr] OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement - draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-02 (Corrected recipient Email)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:30:08 -0000

Authors,  LSR WG,

This mail is to start the Working Group Last Call IPR poll on the subject document.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There are currently no IPR disclosures against draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.