Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16 (Shepherd write-up)

Martin Horneffer <maho@nic.dtag.de> Mon, 25 June 2018 08:15 UTC

Return-Path: <maho@nic.dtag.de>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F29130E0A for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 01:15:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ClNRr2mHTqss for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 01:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owl2.lab.dtag.de (Owl2.lab.DTAG.DE [194.25.1.238]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0231292F1 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 01:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by owl2.lab.dtag.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC463C7207 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:15:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from owl2.lab.dtag.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (owl2.lab.dtag.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LRBuYOm76Nph for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:15:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by owl2.lab.dtag.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DF4C764C for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:15:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dhcp-128.intranet (p5DD92F2D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.217.47.45]) by owl2.lab.dtag.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56472C7207 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:15:42 +0200 (CEST)
To: lsr@ietf.org
References: <CAF18ct5OPY+YMLab5fOLpun=3+4G_KTXNyaMk7BkGsyhA7YHHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Horneffer <maho@nic.dtag.de>
Message-ID: <bc61c7bd-7e0c-5c2c-528c-c1d0e785873c@nic.dtag.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:15:40 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAF18ct5OPY+YMLab5fOLpun=3+4G_KTXNyaMk7BkGsyhA7YHHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/jbojA-ZjRZK2mMGhXK2cwKae_7I>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16 (Shepherd write-up)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 08:15:46 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR related to this document.

Best regards, Martin


Am 11.06.18 um 21:18 schrieb Uma Chunduri:
> Dear All,
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions-16 
> ?
>
> Sending this email as suggested by LSR chairs - as this was not 
> noticed during/around WGLC.
>
> ===
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
> to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing
> list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a
> response has been received from each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> ===
>
> --
> Uma C.