IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Lsr] FW: IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Sat, 01 September 2018 01:07 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7354130E83 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 18:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Crr4R4piSrkH for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 18:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADAE2130DBE for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 18:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=19928; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1535764070; x=1536973670; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=/G88R83DJiPMwrHvp2L5QjZ2aAMyUXBHynFMXbzlhlQ=; b=SQm2D2J+/Aa6fAx7GLBlYvSgbR8oeP16pFedikeVnZm42oqJdJ1X27l+ KrB9eFMbYRzIOmCkkhN0htdFp38/AY/w+95wSq7vPEtb9FjJrP+lkvgA9 qwQuip3ga9hOXqifSUCUdEJ5ncNkr2aOzMQJdIGv8YrpP3pl2uczfE4wq I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BGAgAj5olb/5BdJa1ZGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEIAQEBAYJXd2V/KAqDaJQ+gWglkHqFMxSBZguEbAIXgxUhNRcBAgEBAgEBAm0dC4U3AQEBBCNLBhUCAQgRAwEBASgDAgICMBQHAQEFAwIEE4MfAYEdZKMegS6Ea4UXihwXggCBOQwTgkyESwERAgE1CRaCSzGCJgKJCIQXhViIXwkCj3cXgUCEN4hikz4CERSBJB4BNmRxcBU7KgGCQQmQSm+NAoEcAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,313,1531785600"; d="scan'208,217";a="446118625"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Sep 2018 01:07:45 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w8117jqP000784 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <lsr@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Sep 2018 01:07:45 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 21:07:44 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1367.000; Fri, 31 Aug 2018 21:07:44 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05
Thread-Index: AQHUKqOmD9zpzbkCAE67h6QZ29hqKaSsyZ4AgC35wlCAAAK4gYAABQEA
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 01:07:44 +0000
Message-ID: <A6CF0849-8079-4794-ADC1-BDF329BCE1BD@cisco.com>
References: <023A5C03-A5AD-4F8D-B6E2-1518EA4EEB95@cisco.com> <258C8CDF-387F-4C3C-B243-22C7202F4041@cisco.com> <594D005A3CB0724DB547CF3E9A9E810B01051E17@sjceml521-mbs.china.huawei.com> <6F2A5B85-CED4-46AF-A591-5E1D15B73384@arrcus.com>
In-Reply-To: <6F2A5B85-CED4-46AF-A591-5E1D15B73384@arrcus.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.60.50]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A6CF084980794794ADC1BDF329BCE1BDciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.151, xch-rtp-011.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/kJo5BC546FVB6mYEU-OjIIXiEsA>
Subject: [Lsr] FW: IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2018 01:07:53 -0000

+LSR List

From: Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>
Date: Friday, August 31, 2018 at 8:49 PM
To: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org>, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05

Hi Yingzhen,

Apologies for the delayed response.

I am not aware of any IPRs related to this document.

Regards,
Keyur

On Aug 31, 2018, at 5:43 PM, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.qu@huawei.com<mailto:yingzhen.qu@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Keyur,

I’m writing the shepherd review of this draft, however I didn’t see your IPR reply to this thread. If I missed it, please let me know. Otherwise please send your reply to the email thread.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Manish Bhardwaj (manbhard)
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2018 2:35 PM
To: Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>; draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org>
Cc: lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05

I am not aware of any IPRs.

-Manish.

From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Date: Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 1:59 PM
To: "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit@ietf.org>>
Cc: "lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>" <lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
Subject: IPR Poll for "H-bit Support for OSPFv2" - draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-05
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
Resent-To: <keyur@arrcus.com<mailto:keyur@arrcus.com>>, <padma@huawei.com<mailto:padma@huawei.com>>, <manbhard@cisco.com<mailto:manbhard@cisco.com>>, <serpil@cisco.com<mailto:serpil@cisco.com>>
Resent-Date: Thursday, August 2, 2018 at 1:59 PM

Authors, LSR WG,

This mail is to start the Working Group Last Call IPR poll on the subject document.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There are currently no IPR disclosures against ospf-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing list. The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email