Re: [Lsr] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 13 May 2021 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAC63A1608; Thu, 13 May 2021 10:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l6KMPq24Xtj4; Thu, 13 May 2021 10:20:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46DF23A1606; Thu, 13 May 2021 10:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id w3so40935909ejc.4; Thu, 13 May 2021 10:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UdKr+WR3r7Z1g6ld4Y1GozgvkwypG7JjUgMKz0sM49c=; b=H3hvwq/cHC9VzcCmBLWTU4note0tf+93SXhwwFFm9UDXMsEYJr2PmlHtS7G2COSKbm Poh+u2qfdx9nMDDETJAykF4MGZGqw4ueCgzxXyGdu+lxLuNtBSVBlisS2I/dF4OeCTqU pG2ucywzTAX9iOxFWW4G1AtinjTr5pljTw5LeVYj0s5rlSnt3oq5B8kczLMjSq9jcoJh V22LjuaW7hpwbRuUnUNcfmVUMADUS5S7mFQvylCGL8TVJm/0VBQOTLhIJw+cW1zx9tIb sM8K7t4dhyGTWwCwJKzXaEryMImitKchYTkusZRcDMGi4A7YhpsXtOoUO2G1rjWJySl7 kcaQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UdKr+WR3r7Z1g6ld4Y1GozgvkwypG7JjUgMKz0sM49c=; b=fyC+27xb/JrE9TU+bV+ykoIyJkvbQU56jW/7jTbJ26hLjk9jI1gsClR2HDD5+M/lKC Li19bPlKej+nm74o7xnPbutwf4f1bs2DQqTIAuLZZf4qZpnS2fsix5ahzdTJKpl8rkOj kWmFdZQ62vD2mOIKdEH7FyEChBE6PNXfjne2Ucr27tC54aBjn/+HRe322yPHTx/vD37c DNn6Nc8DkETmjsCBkOR35gZ9KfBrfkqT654nIrNYZYrDB3MoU0lYuH0pwctk38YHIGQh fHlwsKvrRuiEPaxKRsOUKD37CVxpffUlo1QyElJmIBisQ72jgErciiAnl9PGZuf3sN+v 8clQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532z6q56NvQMkWgw36cMN0BbRg/xMzZ0lKkrJSaFu8Kai7Qhy0zy YrlXVgAUCX0Pth+mbEARC8fGnke2m4VLsJQ5qo+uNqIi
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwM3kKHj1Hm+62btC26NEy4mpC2WCTPmsUPtmha0bfU7+LBiV0n4H0sIW+yMejEEnj5I30Ny+vatCMpM+zKKX4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c01a:: with SMTP id e26mr45067014ejz.300.1620926409594; Thu, 13 May 2021 10:20:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Thu, 13 May 2021 10:20:08 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <162092059520.16031.2606295470570253120@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <162092059520.16031.2606295470570253120@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 10:20:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsw7V4YrsgUf9RR7GOqmTrc9T0gxVs7omF4E34zg0R2RgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions@ietf.org, lsr-chairs@ietf.org, lsr@ietf.org, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/leV22ci04of_cFWfjTofYPHvHHA>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] John Scudder's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 17:20:20 -0000

On May 13, 2021 at 11:44:44 AM, John Scudder wrote:


John:

Hi!

Thanks for the review!


Just replying to one of your comments:

...
>    This documents updates RFC 7370 by modifying an existing registry.
>
> Also, this doesn’t seem to me like an update to RFC 7370. It’s normal for an
> RFC to update an IANA registry, without saying it updates a previous RFC that
> established that registry. I think the “updates” just confuses matters and
> clutters things up, and should be removed.

In this case the document is not only registering a value.  It is
changing the name of the registry, adding an extra column, and
updating all the other entries (§11.1.*).  The Updates tag is used
because it significantly changes the registry.

Thanks!

Alvaro.