Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03

Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net> Mon, 08 March 2021 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09BA3A2B71 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:44:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.356
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.356 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.248, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=ib1RdmQ/; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=cuKq9sA1
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iE2lD2TcLKb2 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:44:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 498643A2B93 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:44:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108163.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 128EbKZl029594; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:43:45 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=Rb/3+hF32u6hfSev7tOEe5f5StOToN/CrXjuL2WFvzQ=; b=ib1RdmQ/3sedQPdpurkNTeOE5Llfgnvi0VtPNS9G36tteE5FP68iiCwhciTGbVs8rup8 CscAnpFoIl6pfpD33ba6yQH1kHUf7q227U4s869lCl5Lpm+ss+/AdnOcYokmcKInGOOt laBfnfYo7dypqcNn6WomGJXjcygbf4ByEZifG1vKn0JuiCSfRxhT1L9dX6ZYWrYE0pCb tgbClEdwEXNXzQvrzdhskNKB/jLQBKPdiQvRWrD2qy25fstj08pDZqFU88RJ35QxwgS3 t3pgTY/E2Z86j/5WKnmFMeygHINnL6D1lB7RueQirnxZk21OajABBaw8jQGAsBj0UH5K zA==
Received: from nam12-bn8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam12lp2175.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.55.175]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3745uutygp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 06:43:44 -0800
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=QrjRtPqAN1mHVbgrbVc7JXgLVB++xXOL/9Pd+U8gsBtES2GeAwzGt8z2hh4XYBLyv6c19qIzr7sFjpPFkxHGVa3O2+Cft3RbIDjgYcNOSjzIzXRP2C6hFxwADYCzvDZ2UB5S0ltbexqEt2N45jxxU333JhoINmMW1+sCJdZkYB3l2txNN/P8zknbIy40+aQsnhxUpqc9GaCYMg9eQPlrrSXLqTIa58vdeYOEROUEoGxWDhGX33+km24YNbdIBz4BClvUoHctIlVqkhkkOKukx/hSdv18vdgRgXcxCtdPb3GixyiMfrE59bx0vMDuYGyAsLFo9DIQAwT98k2/EqoTvg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Rb/3+hF32u6hfSev7tOEe5f5StOToN/CrXjuL2WFvzQ=; b=dgc2wB3X5vam7uE/Ii8+oH9R4LV8UXyDr7dgUEg/IG80VR2Afvr90iSBg5SQeqio3VDN2t8ABEGObn1I1WAA5vq5YAHyYyjnMsCxi23K4U9nwewFMAH/X5oAEe41XOy+VbPDBkAmsKnNuSMRbA+Rpqk5cntJufxNUe+eAVS741uPYsrLG7FEqlt6uOMHVUJyKBCIZyRZo6tatatuIPmR7W1jl7J9B5ov+dzde4YJvaW+YAM1Dy2v4LqDTnHupDLXdRS8qi7WnJBk6zGjQ6yBApJiRVLplZLBTOSc+lNGf0Sn86jK7lL0Pb/3BJA2xb2IjBjx7t8RJMOpdEzT/UKVvg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Rb/3+hF32u6hfSev7tOEe5f5StOToN/CrXjuL2WFvzQ=; b=cuKq9sA1fvNz1tmw+QouFuBU9t5YU27D1iGOcJ0H5SNuwCEewGECW2FLN/0f/M6p7lmi0Z6ISDMI3Z7haffX2Sm71a6i6USSJCN1hBlBaoN5VCt81hR0eziib80fVz898OphUJyI5PJNqLNK6PZzhJGutM5+Eue2+JhjfV60vEo=
Received: from BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a02:85::18) by BYAPR05MB4646.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:a03:46::33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3912.16; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:43:43 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cd99:e95b:705c:2420]) by BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cd99:e95b:705c:2420%4]) with mapi id 15.20.3912.027; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:43:42 +0000
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad@juniper.net>
To: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
CC: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
Thread-Index: AQHXFClu5njhetGhNEOR09l6Q1DubA==
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:43:42 +0000
Message-ID: <54882636-246F-4609-805D-AFE9FCC5A249@juniper.net>
References: <6413094C-F1D8-4DBF-B365-E943473FDDE4@cisco.com> <BY5PR11MB433727F6D0A365B26896625DC1979@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <2021030421033728661450@foxmail.com> <BY5PR11MB43378320E0607268CA22A900C1979@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHL4ritC6x_STU4YqaXCqaWPnOZqAS8XSXiDzEGjfb35w@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hOcWh0UFJB4BMta6X9_Kv9c0Dpu3ZUbGQV324p5UYu7oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV2MJoJdS8VKSfQXb5t6BNs19DOPpWF_y70kw1UP+Kk+NA@mail.gmail.com> <cce9bf49158e439f8e6ae868cf16ec0f@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <cce9bf49158e439f8e6ae868cf16ec0f@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ContentBits=0; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=0ade88fd-a167-4cbb-bfb8-062502bab97f; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2021-03-08T14:34:02Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Method=Standard; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use Only;MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=true;
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.46.21021202
authentication-results: huawei.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;huawei.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [2607:fea8:e31f:e400:5091:facb:c9c5:939f]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cee8b063-bed9-43b5-64e0-08d8e2409215
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB4646:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB4646510AE7EF3C67F24EFB8DB7939@BYAPR05MB4646.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(376002)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(366004)(6486002)(66946007)(966005)(5660300002)(54906003)(66476007)(64756008)(66616009)(66446008)(110136005)(66556008)(83380400001)(166002)(36756003)(76116006)(91956017)(33656002)(2906002)(99936003)(478600001)(316002)(6506007)(2616005)(8936002)(4326008)(53546011)(186003)(71200400001)(6512007)(86362001)(48020200001)(45980500001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_54882636246F4609805DAFE9FCC5A249junipernet_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BYAPR05MB4136.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cee8b063-bed9-43b5-64e0-08d8e2409215
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Mar 2021 14:43:42.8095 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: yyARgkSbm5OY477nBWMPhz2K+xGYQuzgfidqUHKT3eN5jVAzEf5iFpmXlrS06y0zuH+6sKW6ehC9BAAhk2jb+w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB4646
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-03-08_08:2021-03-08, 2021-03-08 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2103080080
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/lkxgcC76PYRlSBQB4XVFlr1dasI>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:44:47 -0000

Hi authors,

My understanding is the draft is proposing a separate MT topology (unique MT-ID) to identify a forwarding treatment to be enforced on a shared resource.
While this may work for limited number of MT topologies (i.e. forwarding treatments), as described in RF5120 there is overhead with creating/advertising and managing and running separate SPF for each of the MT topology. This will restrict the scalability of such approach (number of forwarding treatments to be realized) using this approach.

In I-D.draft-bestbar-lsr-spring-sa we are proposing carrying an independent ID (associated with the forwarding treatment) independent of the topology ID. This allows the # of forwarding treatmentst to be independent of the # of MT topologies that need to be managed by IGP; and hence, allow it to scale. Your feedback on this approach is welcome.

Regards,
Tarek


On 3/8/21, 9:29 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Dongjie (Jimmy)" <lsr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of jie.dong@huawei.com<mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com>> wrote:

Hi Gyan,

Thanks for your comments.

As you mentioned, both MT and MI can provide separate topologies and the topology based computation, and MI can provide separate LSDBs at some additional cost (separate adjacencies, etc.). In this document, the resource of VTN mainly refers to the forwarding plane resources, thus MT is chosen as it can provide the required functionality with less overhead.

Hope this helps.

Best regards,
Jie

From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra
Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 7:29 AM
To: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>; Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03


Dear Authors

Why was MT chosen and not MI for VTN underlay network slice underpinning.  MT instances has separate topology but not separate LSDB where MI Multi instance RFC 6822 has a separate LSDB for resources isolation and I think would be a better fit for VTN underlay provisioning.

MI
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6822

Thanks

Gyan

On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:34 AM Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com<mailto:tonysietf@gmail.com>> wrote:

Robert ruminated:

That said I think perhaps we are indeed missing LROW WG (Local Routing Operations WG) where just like in GROW WG where mainly (Global) BGP operational aspects are discussed there could be good place to discuss operational aspects of link state protocols deployment and use cases. In fact perhaps it would also free some LSR bandwidth to really focus on protocol extensions.


+1

IGPs grew a zoo of horns and bells by now and no'one tells the operators which spines are poisonous ;-)

--- tony
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org<mailto:Lsr@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
--

[图像已被发件人删除。]<http://www.verizon.com/>

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect

M 301 502-1347
13101 Columbia Pike
Silver Spring, MD



Juniper Business Use Only