Re: [Lsr] [spring] IETF 106 - SPRING agenda

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 07 November 2019 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F0D120932 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 01:52:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Ymh_rt_Tgdr for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 01:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com (mail-qk1-x730.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 113AE1208ED for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2019 01:52:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id m4so1392382qke.9 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 01:52:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ls7VAMWJ5tb3+7fkL+3iY3Yz8KTeh6pfp0EXzJwc6iA=; b=db/vfrqge1N86dYPd+6ElMDbb0iWhqOYIVh8HJC/lmeL+TppgEp81rttkCn4p8nUdv ublrPxmi3Vu9WMPGgjcqzvgxsDn/OH9n/sEHLqThrjVq2cUrHTJQ5YaDdyl2Sv2/7f20 sQJmW/h+t7KBAu3Nnd889XCJgdF3xuBaeo60C3YP6pXiEquu7rq/5WjclrugQ8ABQYwB UzYw91L7nbL3CohwtdmcAQ7SIuSoj/shmgiQY+zYOef3AilkOcWnIlxRNIZ55XREU+J4 LjmrB3acWsm74cUO/92qsGnpGtUnXexoJYl8TdkqZLIOPmhD6qadTV+BeMe7MMWNb9vz QhFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ls7VAMWJ5tb3+7fkL+3iY3Yz8KTeh6pfp0EXzJwc6iA=; b=qVX1vf5hNsgPpQafKF86cM/wwm6PcGELBRHK6wSwOH69wwrscWaP33ZuBhrlXA2iwx Ri7XvWtSmCpsLbG7tpEEiDp1ZHId86E4P3fpLNw/UowWfauot5AlJGKe8z44TsUR4XKO mEcrbysJLggXA9/gBevPrIU1CeOhSAZvTW216arpTfsWH0jgEWniEw9KywXXWbVyJ69X hswUbuPBS2EEIvkqYkX/5sS/oJ8lps54JX9L7bmf1XjamrpllAojL2ntdk4imf663Qy5 U0h3iL6g55NwnsIROlp0FGrtG1vPYJmDpPT92t0srI5zODIxXaJN3Dir/91xC9hKKYpa P2ug==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/03gkhThAzr9pJGSLH+tMd1jo68L6VTkLA96o+TPnxlMP+cut /KGDh3ke7zUzRzztCb7gTdbgpApENLjc17A+Yn9j7g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzgWuIjxCxSFd5OqPzvpRc7ho+c/SXZi7in0v9B4FoUL59/uGamPVpS3k+GeP+hbg3w6qKxJdsMCZdlz/NOKcY=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4cf:: with SMTP id 15mr1778862qks.445.1573120356960; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 01:52:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8966_1571833701_5DB04765_8966_117_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48C61811@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <DM6PR19MB3689EB415E6AE22DA4E260ADFC780@DM6PR19MB3689.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR19MB3689EB415E6AE22DA4E260ADFC780@DM6PR19MB3689.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:52:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEeS4BUjM9Jc+dSh1mSNF8UTDV6cKtEbS-vBdau5XK+bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
Cc: SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, lsr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000010d8240596bea0f7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/lwjjsWi5LI9w12083RevyVlXI1U>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] [spring] IETF 106 - SPRING agenda
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 09:52:42 -0000

*>   Once advertised in the network using a suitable link state protocol
>   (such as OSPF, ISIS or BGP-LS),*


Whow ... never imagined that BGP-LS would be called one day a "link
state protocol" and an equal sign would be made to OSPF and ISIS.


Best,
Robert.


PS. As to the proposal in draft itself it is clearly possible - but
then troubleshooting and operating such mixed network would be a
simple nightmare.



On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 3:25 AM Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Hi SPRING WG and Chairs,
>
>
>
> We would like to request a presentation time slot for
>
> - I-D: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saad-sr-fa-link-00
>
> - Speaker: Tarek Saad
>
> - Desired time: 10 minutes
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tarek
>