Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-02

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Wed, 05 August 2020 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935DC3A0F9F for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sIcWxeE3T685 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa30.google.com (mail-vk1-xa30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C503A0FDB for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 14:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa30.google.com with SMTP id r197so5657268vkf.13 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 14:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jT9gZ4h/8nozr4Oxwz5UlYlLz/IZBNavvicyZrR8uUI=; b=VNakH/jzPlRokS0mBtu0Jx+dIe8tTn1dbAHRVYmfzYr00qEL3HzG+7qEP9NntqfRvq qnJvxUwcqWr7N3nm59PTBuYTECQXwF4QqB49s5AuJuRVhd6iLM1V2qHBda6HnuaIIrwl vYv36xY3UludMw86jLmP6UX4qYdZdUSTSOYYQ3WzY1J3fdhVZfFinIkEhnmJ7hn1VhXP h3eV8++wfPL8V/E1xaV5+8xA0PB3mnrxGlmUypdh/ftGGfJaRHAeSOXWAlCHy6V1UyJh Gnvn1gLkZU0Xg9Ca8/j0hKXPUoDtqu86lS17A7CURWIyb2jYm/1ACaiVo+ok5dLEE0mr R/aQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jT9gZ4h/8nozr4Oxwz5UlYlLz/IZBNavvicyZrR8uUI=; b=KkUZyVkXydNBi9fZ8bsXDhjuZNwMZJ9K6o1QYqPxXgLS1h9bqIrI/X/lmfWVvF0kWx ZpPeJQgV8z14FnSShsFeCz5RaxUm0e9Zazl05f8JBkHBth2JXVZvuT140QfCSs1dXsXe 6sQpUdEn/Xl7G8nu1Zz7FZSmoIqjvnkQA5qZR315RxnX19yLc/6KzRr2/yDeKKxMi01o cKalB99UCV7B5fv3ict/WzRJlIKRInByYCH6dPeiW8YmbQel0FdMq4cltDo4jFjGHpu6 /tDHeEec101m8bdHScqL3tkbH53Z7LDeh5rqgyptCC+B7TL7haI+K5Eo3AGGaCUH1d1m SBZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533aOII5J7BYwketKMa4AkL0XZqvuosj0IpnT7T3OgCiILZT1Ptk SOpLCYPbcJ0GKsw+WRc5VYIB+qRtGCiomSHvlXA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSZ1kRN+BDBqJgDZJJDP9O9qyMT8mx5KzbEzT9Ou1qVGx5HHN5OVG5xzSWDJQCDbXjtL3MU/BMwFzBorNTCtA=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:c745:: with SMTP id x66mr4244334vkf.82.1596662562503; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 14:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <32323_1596545126_5F295866_32323_118_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48F0BB30@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BY5PR11MB43375CB413060250B336BE64C14A0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <4558_1596554251_5F297C0B_4558_298_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A48F0C59B@OPEXCAUBM43.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <95A83DB0-A58C-4BD5-AF0B-8EF49D20EB3A@gmail.com> <89F6F8E5-E11D-4A6E-A783-8C9384FE3A1A@cisco.com> <BY5PR11MB4337DB5B017781522AAF9E66C14B0@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <824DFF9C-56E4-4E4F-A249-2E9413D85CC4@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <824DFF9C-56E4-4E4F-A249-2E9413D85CC4@gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 17:22:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV1CXFerzKcgtdaVkNEi6Pg_CmL191XRKtErY3jMKtqFnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Bruno Decraene <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, Les Ginsberg <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000dd3ea205ac27f80f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/m42Ugf2XOaJVHve0F7b2ud2KJs4>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy-02
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 21:22:46 -0000

Hi Bruno

>From an operators perspective your creative  idea of using the existing SR
machinery using the node SID to advertise the Area SID in the Proxy LSP is
very attractive to be able to support the feature immediately without
requiring a feature upgrade to support.

This idea really helps the area proxy concept  come to fruition without
impacting operations.

Thanks

Gyan

On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 4:08 PM Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Les,
>
>
> *a)Advertise the “Area Prefix” in the Area Proxy TLV – much as we do a
> router-id today in the Router-ID TLV.*
>
>
>
> This would make the Area Prefix mandatory for Area Proxy, which is not
> desired.  We would prefer it to remain optional and thus part of the Area
> SID sub-TLV.
>
>
> *b)The remaining info (reachability and SID) can then be provided using
> existing Prefix Reachability advertisements – no need for new sub-TLV for
> “Area SID”. This eliminates any potential issues if the SID advertised by
> “Area SID sub-TLV” were to differ from the SID advertised in Prefix
> Reachability for the same prefix.*
>
>
>
> As we discussed privately, we view this as a non-issue.  The Area Leader
> is the one advertising both the Area SID sub-TLV and the Proxy LSP. If
> there’s a coding error, there’s a coding error. There is a single source of
> truth (the Area Leader’s config) and we cannot protect against every
> possible coding error.  Reconciling the prefix with a separate
> advertisement has a non-trivial chance of being broken too, and IMHO, much
> larger.
>
>
>  *There then remains the question as to whether the “Area Prefix” is
> anycast or unicast i.e., is it common to all IERs or is it unique to
> whomever gets elected Area Leader?*
>
>
>
> Does it matter? We have no clear semantics for this prefix. A difference
> that makes no difference is no difference.
>
> Tony
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *



*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD