IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00

"Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> Tue, 17 July 2018 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ginsberg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B7B130F6D; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KhcNRf4Oj6KG; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E24FD130F5F; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 10:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=33726; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1531848610; x=1533058210; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=AeYmtGQs9me+Ypj4ZYvdy77UDmcuKWgaKPNmAcsJJDY=; b=CXycISp5gyLb2Y2MoyOCu1PUm8yt85ePIIYyAwzKvbG72mmVvoYQGJN7 CTpxY1vUqnueJ+lOYLbKv2Hqp/1HJ/iL2/M2132hT4XQqj+aDjH0HdoJw 4lPA7yZTlv/kHlbzJXd1BEYB798LmdtuDid52E+ZXGI8NcE5sRp4V2SWV o=;
X-Files: Diff draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-01.txt.htm : 21802
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C4AAA9Jk5b/5RdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYMbLmN/KAqDc4FfhiWMPIIMdYYxjhMUgWYLGAEMgxCBNwIXglkhNBgBAgEBAgEBAm0cDIU2AQEBBAEBGwYKQQsMBAIBCBEEAQEBIAEJAgICJQsdCAIEAQ0FCAaDE4F/D6pxgS6KNw+JAoFXP4EQgl01gw4LAQECAReBCwgBCwcBRYJbglUCkGmCaYYKCQKDW4IthVuDOoFLHiWDToZ6gReHfYI8hzQCERSBJB04YXFwFTuCaQmBbDAXiFmFPm8BincPFwSBBIEaAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,366,1526342400"; d="htm'217?scan'217,208,217";a="143913062"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Jul 2018 17:30:08 +0000
Received: from xch-rcd-011.cisco.com (xch-rcd-011.cisco.com [173.37.102.21]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w6HHU6Ue019403 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:30:07 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com (173.36.7.11) by XCH-RCD-011.cisco.com (173.37.102.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 12:30:05 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) by XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com ([173.36.7.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 17 Jul 2018 12:30:05 -0500
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>
To: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr-ads@ietf.org" <lsr-ads@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
Thread-Index: AQHT8qrGJqItV2jLOk6/uKLGp9vNZ6RhijtQgAUplACALWYVgP//58jw
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:30:05 +0000
Message-ID: <14116bedbaae4aa78a36add828f9429d@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <87y3gatmql.fsf@chopps.org> <45c18832cc9143f9b6fff0c1da4b742c@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <6623B634-A565-454C-AD4E-E2DE28C89B93@cisco.com> <4dbe9a99763d4d39a320fcf498303eda@XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4dbe9a99763d4d39a320fcf498303eda@XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.23.93]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_002_14116bedbaae4aa78a36add828f9429dXCHALN001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/mTkVBL_8r-J_Wh7rEx3h2Z5w2rs>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:30:16 -0000

Ketan -

Thanx for taking on the role of shepherd.

I am attaching some proposed diffs which I think addresses your concern.
Let me know if this suffices and we can publish an update.

   Les


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 6:55 AM
> To: Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
> <ginsberg@cisco.com>; Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>; lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr-chairs@ietf.org; lsr-ads@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I was reviewing this draft as the Shepherd. It is a fairly simple and
> straightforward bis update to RFC7810 to fix an encoding error.
> 
> There is one point that I would like the authors and WG to consider.
> 
> The draft in the appendix talks about two interpretations of the erroneous sub-
> TLVs and from the conversation on the list I get the impression that there are at
> least two implementations out there which did different interpretations. Do we
> want to consider putting in a suggestion (i.e. not normative perhaps) that
> implementations updated to this specifications accept the sub-TLV with the
> Reserved field included and size 5? So they don't consider such an encoding as
> error or malformed on reception?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ketan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
> Sent: 18 June 2018 17:38
> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg@cisco.com>; Christian Hopps
> <chopps@chopps.org>; lsr@ietf.org
> Cc: lsr-chairs@ietf.org; lsr-ads@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00
> 
> Hi Les,
> Yes - the Working Group Last call has completed. We'll find a shepherd and
> request publication.
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> On 6/15/18, 10:49 AM, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>     WG chairs -
> 
>     Can we consider WG last call completed? (It has been more than 3 weeks...)
> 
>     Would really like to get this small but important correction published ASAP
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email