| < draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00.txt | draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-01.txt > | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Link State Routing L. Ginsberg, Ed. | Link State Routing L. Ginsberg, Ed. | |||
| Internet-Draft Cisco Systems, Inc. | Internet-Draft Cisco Systems, Inc. | |||
| Obsoletes: 7810 (if approved) S. Previdi, Ed. | Obsoletes: 7810 (if approved) S. Previdi, Ed. | |||
| Intended status: Standards Track Huawei | Intended status: Standards Track Huawei | |||
| Expires: October 27, 2018 S. Giacolone | Expires: January 18, 2019 S. Giacolone | |||
| Microsoft | Microsoft | |||
| D. Ward | D. Ward | |||
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | Cisco Systems, Inc. | |||
| J. Drake | J. Drake | |||
| Juniper Networks | Juniper Networks | |||
| Q. Wu | Q. Wu | |||
| Huawei | Huawei | |||
| April 25, 2018 | July 17, 2018 | |||
| IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions | IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions | |||
| draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-00 | draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis-01 | |||
| Abstract | Abstract | |||
| In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial | In certain networks, such as, but not limited to, financial | |||
| information networks (e.g., stock market data providers), network- | information networks (e.g., stock market data providers), network- | |||
| performance criteria (e.g., latency) are becoming as critical to | performance criteria (e.g., latency) are becoming as critical to | |||
| data-path selection as other metrics. | data-path selection as other metrics. | |||
| This document describes extensions to IS-IS Traffic Engineering | This document describes extensions to IS-IS Traffic Engineering | |||
| Extensions (RFC 5305) such that network-performance information can | Extensions (RFC 5305) such that network-performance information can | |||
| skipping to change at page 2, line 20 ¶ | skipping to change at page 2, line 20 ¶ | |||
| Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering | |||
| Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute | |||
| working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- | |||
| Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. | |||
| Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months | |||
| and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any | |||
| time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference | |||
| material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." | |||
| This Internet-Draft will expire on October 27, 2018. | This Internet-Draft will expire on January 18, 2019. | |||
| Copyright Notice | Copyright Notice | |||
| Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the | |||
| document authors. All rights reserved. | document authors. All rights reserved. | |||
| This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal | |||
| Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents | |||
| (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of | |||
| publication of this document. Please review these documents | publication of this document. Please review these documents | |||
| skipping to change at page 18, line 29 ¶ | skipping to change at page 18, line 29 ¶ | |||
| the ambiguity. | the ambiguity. | |||
| The choice made here is to omit the unused RESERVED field from these | The choice made here is to omit the unused RESERVED field from these | |||
| sub-TLVs and use the length of 4. This matches the corresponding | sub-TLVs and use the length of 4. This matches the corresponding | |||
| advertisements specified in the equivalent OSPF specification | advertisements specified in the equivalent OSPF specification | |||
| [RFC7471] and the corresponding BGP-LS specification | [RFC7471] and the corresponding BGP-LS specification | |||
| [I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp]. | [I-D.ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp]. | |||
| Some minor editorial corrections have also been made. | Some minor editorial corrections have also been made. | |||
| Implementations may wish to consider temporarily supporting sending/ | ||||
| receiving the form of the sub-TLVs using a length of 5 and including | ||||
| the RESERVED field as a means of interoperating with the legacy | ||||
| implementations. However, the intent of this revision is to specify | ||||
| one and only one normative behavior. Any existing implementations | ||||
| which encode the sub-TLVs using a length of 5 are expected to be | ||||
| revised to conform to the normative behavior specified in this | ||||
| document. | ||||
| Authors' Addresses | Authors' Addresses | |||
| Les Ginsberg (editor) | Les Ginsberg (editor) | |||
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | Cisco Systems, Inc. | |||
| Email: ginsberg@cisco.com | Email: ginsberg@cisco.com | |||
| Stefano Previdi (editor) | Stefano Previdi (editor) | |||
| Huawei | Huawei | |||
| End of changes. 5 change blocks. | ||||
| 4 lines changed or deleted | 13 lines changed or added | |||
This html diff was produced by rfcdiff 1.47. The latest version is available from http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/ | ||||