IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

"Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Sat, 09 May 2020 06:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81EC63A084D for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 23:51:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=FjEBmSoq; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=SdLcnt/r
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z8C8lmSFJUk1 for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2020 23:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E70A3A0849 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2020 23:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6236; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1589007104; x=1590216704; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=k/KwwIYsABNZqmfAurQMYBy2DtmP8lLViwoM3EQwREU=; b=FjEBmSoq1kiTpPOV5e4Gf1L9HnQFLJmsR6jVo0u2ra5tTANWlzvvY1Xg CAq+DftqgTkvArPMYwb3m8xh2v+KuQDUwRmGT+soo75AZzIxamjpA+Ifg IHrDFCxf0GH/slXy24ojw+Cg0HrEvmxTJ3gTTxx02TqpQOfsaoQrAmV03 o=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:ve6lQxyPUmjkNMjXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5ZRaBt/Nqj17AGJ7R5vZAzeHRtvOoVW8B5MOHt3YPONxJWgQegMob1wonHIaeCEL9IfKrCk5yHMlLWFJ/uX3uN09TFZX4YF7Tqzip5zMWHlP0Mg8mbujwE5TZ2sKw0e368pbPYgJO0Ty6Z746LBi/oQjL8McMho43IacqwRyPqXxNKOk=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A0BAD8UbZe/4MNJK1mHQEBAQEJARIBBQUBQIE2BQELAYEkL1EFb1gvLAqHYAOLMYIRk1WEY4JSA1QLAQEBDAEBLQIEAQGERAKCDiQ3Bg4CAwEBCwEBBQEBAQIBBQRthVYMhXEBAQEBAxIbEwEBOA8CAQgRBAEBLzIdCAEBBAESCBqDBYF+TQMtAQGjfgKBOYhhdIE0gwEBAQWFQBiCDgmBOAGCYolhGoFBP4ERQ4JNPoRQg0WCLZdwim+QEAqCSphFnTqQHZ0qAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFoI4FWcBWDJFAYDZBAg3KKVnQ3AgYIAQEDCXyMOgGBDwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,370,1583193600"; d="scan'208,217";a="749267099"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 May 2020 06:51:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0496phYh003428 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 9 May 2020 06:51:43 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 9 May 2020 01:51:43 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 9 May 2020 02:51:42 -0400
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 9 May 2020 02:51:41 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ocIf3zImi2EimUpPyjyAdwOUJuMnOg/Go4ZLdWsXBfDPONUz3Nh1a2CUC7dn2YLuAcmyIHIFV03OhkIbsAqF66th0FRU4a35M7/MDqaT+MUKAkZ8wvlt57v9Rf1tndaMrlTIq4zgbgOFKMN4b6SmSSeGrvak8MA1rpnhqnigcMxJMuXCZ/fC/SGXCp/ME1wThI34oMscRFZv2Zrz7pzQMBb2FZyIAZCKKPLPMRqid7pqXldsS9WLp58I1ha6xCSz+rKfxlvw/KFgo3RsrMqzrthoL21R5BQhJuJwVq0y0hveXKUkUIMkV60fxVVa4VeSqFy6BfUjVNZRL4pWshF0cg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZfayGgmHmt+gDd1UYj/pvSYbkpU8g5lcINUeEkpYHbo=; b=gFwWdcbEySxZU1fXev/dk35/npmHvw1obSiZwyiMnQQpT/QUr7abByVqiNKK+YaFvXJ7In/rpAqZu94kl/c3lnY9Kf1YcYBOevk4vPv5ec9NczObYQudDdGeAzT5RAcz7ymhtEvdD/gH6gL729pV4tJD/FnM7YebhS9zcIajRhxMIAZcrN4wdZEOlyzJ3BY5uuvFfsHAmnv9Km5a2ChiflcxN3rE01oDD3V7pDy9B4SsThy3qNHYiZ2QyRPyho+F2s6AmNNmtqKndChThIgq2nCAWINLY5mAQZOiqEUs0+SJIuL//iVsvY9xiYqvXnq4BkrdPLB3DZBQllL22w/ksA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ZfayGgmHmt+gDd1UYj/pvSYbkpU8g5lcINUeEkpYHbo=; b=SdLcnt/r65zIlmOYz63TgDeu79qT5WOrqs3yee3c5yh6Ozq1fiihWvQRm6WVpB/JA/Wj3N4rZdfDAOjIq2J4vx8tFXdMmQRv0sQ0F/jrVhl0w/h12+mW+kE/mUoM26WDlFpXqWqFEmNCK95T0HWxGqz+7a51o51tk9fujVuSjvk=
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:5f::22) by MW3PR11MB4732.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:2c::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2979.28; Sat, 9 May 2020 06:51:41 +0000
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9552:d301:4b19:601c]) by MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9552:d301:4b19:601c%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2979.028; Sat, 9 May 2020 06:51:41 +0000
From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: "Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)" <weibin.wang@nokia-sbell.com>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
Thread-Index: AdYlOXl7J26ZJEOiSNe/050l75qS7gAlJoJw
Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 06:51:40 +0000
Message-ID: <MW3PR11MB4570B9F5FE3774B0475B6EF6C1A30@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <7255730c312a40a1a2d36972095845a4@nokia-sbell.com>
In-Reply-To: <7255730c312a40a1a2d36972095845a4@nokia-sbell.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: nokia-sbell.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;nokia-sbell.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [49.36.52.93]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b2b9ef37-3906-4296-c29d-08d7f3e56dcf
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MW3PR11MB4732:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MW3PR11MB4732B03F3273ACEF38A65329C1A30@MW3PR11MB4732.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 03982FDC1D
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(346002)(376002)(33430700001)(2906002)(33440700001)(52536014)(53546011)(6506007)(7696005)(4744005)(26005)(478600001)(66476007)(316002)(66556008)(55016002)(8936002)(110136005)(9326002)(5660300002)(8676002)(186003)(33656002)(64756008)(66946007)(9686003)(66446008)(86362001)(71200400001)(76116006); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 4Ll3+3QTO2uwBy5v/l6l2SKUBImN9mvdZOJoPzNUAhfGwYZfpTLjvdD3OSKzn3bDtl4+X0lTP2bO8wLrL0gIg/Yf6zbkCvDLwTYLM4NsEezgR0olLeovyAV2uqTRhdTlbb6IZi8R1Y8aZRLWTqmwBl3InfeJbuOZ+/IJanAzKhW8Z+UfUoNV4FlwFA+F5+bA2jwNfrQLWcL+5AmIIuRO9tUwd/2nlKJDR3f0OYlJuTqraukb9Vt3Cd5QPwiylbpCnqHr1xioVJU8aJv8mVii/sBJh+olq9OKHkfdEL9e8vra3j7o2HfqwnJrozSECnwUak7mIGXHCacODuoJd16d8MtOXZyW4nVS/pDLZBc/eEzOWYYkrJOwoKcY4tkTd061venF7YqBSna9nNoSiUiJ/cfr2HcmxILM8h6gvrQWKVz8EcCsvJnqOtJaLsMd8h1BRqHKOWsZaXgFEF+t1BYNrWULaOvf0Qj2v89oD1PJLpE=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MW3PR11MB4570B9F5FE3774B0475B6EF6C1A30MW3PR11MB4570namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b2b9ef37-3906-4296-c29d-08d7f3e56dcf
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 May 2020 06:51:40.9532 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: YRAT5si6HhW4nZ1hgKJ0wPyI5H9gCrX6MdFD3BtNrUqSwjCQyYMN6OEwSTlLOu9pk+InpTi7fULSCw/hI8Vbsg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MW3PR11MB4732
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.15, xch-aln-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/mt7ldaFU7O6VPUurxOpgpllLhgo>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 06:51:47 -0000

Hi Wang,

You are correct. Though I wouldn't call it a goal but rather a benefit/advantage - same applies to SR-MPLS where the label stack can be reduced.

Thanks,
Ketan

From: Lsr <lsr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Wang, Weibin (NSB - CN/Shanghai)
Sent: 08 May 2020 19:07
To: lsr@ietf.org
Subject: [Lsr] draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo

Hi authors:

After reading through this draft lsr-flex-algo, I want to know whether there is a potential goal of this draft to reduce the SRH size with enabling flex-algo with admin group in SRv6 deployment, because without flex-algo we have to have a big SRH size when the SRH include more SRv6 SIDs, if we enable flex-algo under special topology and link constraint condition, in theory we can even construct  a end to end SR path/tunnel without SRH, but it still meet TE requirement. So my question is whether the flex-algo can be used as tool to reduce SRH size?



Cheers !

WANG Weibin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email