Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 27 September 2019 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A59120120; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 05:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=Sch+Oqw5; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=WFOBogmt
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rgMtM02Q4Wie; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 05:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 898BE12004C; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 05:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=14965; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1569587444; x=1570797044; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Fny/ghfSM+JOpwF8HQx6sFqpJNzHADZ7K6XbiX4ioB0=; b=Sch+Oqw5vZCjYRKbcBXxiLGIvj+eiWaCt1SPa05ZGTveljcuyrL7ftc/ KOxzPZhYl/sz6djMpPdXuhFZocGeD9dpbjOX1jp5HMdGiMZNYvfnlllbK Fjf13kY1yGrPNJ8XkcpFiwVA2JYPWvINx4NLGBF8IUlMWcfhdns8zz8o6 o=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AYQ4KKRVSnJmT0JrPumzBit5xGUTV8LGuZFwc94?= =?us-ascii?q?YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSANiJ8OpK3uzRta2oGXcN55qMqjgjSNRNTF?= =?us-ascii?q?dEwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/Zic3EexJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DNAACsAI5d/4QNJK1mGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEMAgEBAQGBZ4EcL1ADbVYgBAsqhCKDRwOKV4I3JYlniTCEX4JSA1QJAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BDAEBLQIBAYRAAheDICM4EwIDCQEBBAEBAQIBBQRthS0MhUsBAQEEEhEdAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?3AQ8CAQgOAwMBAigDAgICHxEUCQgCBAENBSKDAAGBHU0DHQECowECgTiIYXW?= =?us-ascii?q?BMoJ9AQEFhQwNC4IXCYE0jA4YgX+BEScME4JMPoIagkoWglUygiaMVIJSN4U?= =?us-ascii?q?tiSiOKEEKgiKRCQSDfhuZNI4hiiGOfQIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSGBWHAVZQGCQVA?= =?us-ascii?q?QFIFOOIM6ilN0gSmOHQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,555,1559520000"; d="scan'208,217";a="333817649"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 27 Sep 2019 12:30:29 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (xch-aln-015.cisco.com [173.36.7.25]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x8RCUSWd014314 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:30:29 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-ALN-015.cisco.com (173.36.7.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:30:28 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 08:30:27 -0400
Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:30:27 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=UUyh5NwioVDSVf5H/SjSh+nIprAgc2MsHo5HcX7lshTSOa0YKO86l6PJGDp4oJg/anm/XjJwxVXaOQ+JfAkOVTvR7SpGwVHC8dzMVQL4hbH9tv3xFMsg7GA4RQwKIc02sPn4AAxg4LOhV6t8Gewneh+t2is8eyyFaW4usQP6EVnPuKcY4VBki690gQ7MMzMOn+xoUiX4jwynDWYxLomqiIP/SJAEzJHwefOgpVnamFsnI75y0UqQeHDmS9rWC1YepZ2xfCs1PQV0tFe/kE+7g6P22OaxJV4g5J1a5tJZH57LLhV38rjSiY2zwXMhhrFwOJc+CBYhZzCjMo51YLr0PQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Fny/ghfSM+JOpwF8HQx6sFqpJNzHADZ7K6XbiX4ioB0=; b=YBIwczSMsuwUXYZPJsZqv10x/kxjG00JQBjcxG8NBwU8Wgb2Eo94k7/zDMz8q8XKyxkI49Rk/XJvJpstwdwNCuHtN2AgkLxPMhiyvM3cT12hA+Z5Szria+IcXUSVHEiVAVV4wjCeeLmwk2ffnxvZUbCWi/KMqYq7ievYh7F7rfweYy42UryIX+/300r406Jn9+RjthudetkcawPTe0anBsxMSj7qjXcqf+HpExB8v3CW1uPfeQneJj0RESTHfrOAzyNr+jrcZh5AjYBYAGdh3Aed2dw0Tiqmu9HcVCwYm2deAr/CqZTcuqNqCNTevQi+NFuRpxl+inrlPQGmKZP34Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Fny/ghfSM+JOpwF8HQx6sFqpJNzHADZ7K6XbiX4ioB0=; b=WFOBogmtbkORTVkUr2VWeBKgsF9rsmp/wZRcpEQZrjpV2gqVV0kJKUr5FJ/eXicMd/eOssrRK14OtMFQ6+XBKbUnDtUAlxjjl0A9UZe8hwl2/cZfkSDsz+w7UxOvVjFDQyV8RyhXxK972L50J42gx/YHyaYrVw57vWbMVhh4ibU=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.179.150.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2305.17; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:30:26 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdc1:a2cf:eb3:a420]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cdc1:a2cf:eb3:a420%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2284.023; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:30:26 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVdCyKKy08Wh2SU0mNM2b0foRlHac+mRYAgACaKoA=
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:30:25 +0000
Message-ID: <370E1315-20A4-4948-8488-393F7B64570D@cisco.com>
References: <156947626551.29034.6816443991581677055.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESsxSQg0LT4cruL8uX2Bf8TdVH3zRy+BMrdTGuE=_dyezrg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsxSQg0LT4cruL8uX2Bf8TdVH3zRy+BMrdTGuE=_dyezrg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1001::1c3]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6ecca25f-0399-4c36-5250-08d7434679a3
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB4144:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB4144D6005A9EAD6A47A83853C2810@MN2PR11MB4144.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:3826;
x-forefront-prvs: 0173C6D4D5
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(376002)(39860400002)(136003)(346002)(366004)(189003)(199004)(71200400001)(102836004)(478600001)(86362001)(14454004)(81156014)(81166006)(8936002)(7736002)(8676002)(25786009)(5660300002)(36756003)(9326002)(2906002)(6116002)(54906003)(316002)(110136005)(6486002)(54896002)(76116006)(33656002)(64756008)(66556008)(66446008)(6512007)(4326008)(236005)(229853002)(6306002)(11346002)(99286004)(6436002)(256004)(53546011)(66476007)(66946007)(6506007)(6246003)(71190400001)(46003)(476003)(446003)(2616005)(486006)(76176011)(186003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB4144; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 5eTjdsjDkHT38pQfz8Iint5M4Vsaf/hM+i1Qj8OQAGdo/nhQDel3xbFxa41UgtTOz1EofPBTl0X6hMwNfSUmqW6M+b9gqNovzJTCNhkwVNU89e2+erkyEwmA8NWB+zR1sTxlHNHR7fMYhH+tSmedNpqpVuCnSoRmGC5EuSZI6uBMMeck0yPlIlnIdaqfQft/gstML6odR50wG9VzOU7DIkwQ/uOJ/Awq81lehrdq5ff84kNwJRn3FJczwGZq7qXnA0bu/p4fG3VsD0U7Ua4e9u6xmrukvh4rNCjVmURSVjIPjEuCI70kJzQZiJVR2i0vsN5zjI8Aldrs3CS4Y3IwtitM/wu9EM6d94jji+Hs/giBszGE+CPRgKu69la9+a7Ez0sjHHdjwSOQgfk51K9wCD/eu0pSNNfgfZrtoN+0mnc=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_370E131520A449488488393F7B64570Dciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6ecca25f-0399-4c36-5250-08d7434679a3
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 27 Sep 2019 12:30:26.0904 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: HtQySQlWqib8Sgib4w6oS7u+1cfAHuWDfhPc9/w3CsijZWnn6x2HXy9nBazRln06
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB4144
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.25, xch-aln-015.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/nxObTyu2-JiRMz58Bpl8flFlHy8>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 12:30:47 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>;
Date: Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 7:18 PM
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>;, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>;
Cc: "draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org"; <draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg@ietf.org>;, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org"; <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>;, "lsr@ietf.org"; <lsr@ietf.org>;, Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>;, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>;
Subject: Re: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-yang-isis-cfg-37: (with COMMENT)
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org>;
Resent-To: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>;, Derek Yeung <derek@arrcus.com>;, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>;, Jeffrey Zhang <zzhang@juniper.net>;, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>;
Resent-Date: Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 7:18 PM

On September 26, 2019 at 1:37:47 AM, Barry Leiba via Datatracker (noreply@ietf.org<mailto:noreply@ietf.org>) wrote:

Acee:

Hi!

— Section 2.3 —
In the last two paragraphs of the section, one uses “should” advertise and the
other uses “SHOULD” advertise. They should either both be BCP 14 key words, or
both not.

In this case, instead of the change to “SHOULD” (which you made in -38), we need to go the other way: s/SHOULD/should

This is from my AD review:

- - - -
...
506   If an implementation does not support per level configuration for a
507   parameter modeled with per level configuration, the implementation
508   SHOULD advertise a deviation to announce the non-support of the
509   level-1 and level-2 containers.

511   Finally, if an implementation supports per level configuration but
512   does not support the level-1-2 configuration, it SHOULD also
513   advertise a deviation.

[major] "SHOULD advertise a deviation"  According to rfc7950: "Deviations MUST never be part of a published standard"; I realize that this document doesn't include one, but it Normatively recommends their use.  s/SHOULD/should
- - - -

I missed in -36 the fact that only the first SHOULD was changed.

You’d think I would have remembered that. I will make both “should” I the -40 revision. -39 simply updated Stephane’s contact info to avoid bounces during IESG review.

Thanks,
Acee




Thanks!

Alvaro.