Re: [Lsr] New draft on Flex-Algorithm Bandwidth Constraints

[Peter Psenak <[e-mail]>]

Aijun,

On 04/03/2021 15:23, Aijun Wang wrote:
> Hi, Peter:
> 
> Whatever the interval is set, I think the measured value is “unpredictable parameter” and should not be used as the input factors for IGP SPF calculations by the network devices.
> Or else, the overall behavior of the network will be uncontrollable.

let me disagree.


> For the delay aware application, we prefer to using the controller to calculate and program the network devices, to let such applications traffic follow one optimized path, to meet the application’s requirements.

I don't object your personal choice.

There is sufficient interest in distributed version of delay optimized 
forwarding in the field. There are multiple implementations of flex-algo 
with delay metric available. There are also multiple deployments of it 
in the field.

thanks,
Peter


> 
> Aijun Wang
> China Telecom
> 
>> On Mar 4, 2021, at 21:30, Peter Psenak <ppsenak=[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/03/2021 14:28, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>>>> Is it minimum ever, is it min of the year, month, week, day ... etc
>>>    https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8570#section-4.2
>>>    Peter
>>> Maybe it is just me but in section 4.2 I see NOTHING about how often that delay should be measured which was the point above.
>>
>> it says it clearly - "over a configurable interval"
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>> Thx,
>>> R.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lsr mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
> 
> 
>