Re: [Lsr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 22 August 2019 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5136120B98; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:53:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=bFODOE4v; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=I3pg3JcE
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 45lpUay-L2cd; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5434120803; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 12:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3798; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1566503607; x=1567713207; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=6vzVQxLQ2Fktv2eSUPe1Mn546xz6TPDuVY/+3V0ljRs=; b=bFODOE4vkQ1BNpVNctx1CyrF2pMNt8a+THiVYcok3RrZWSJ27IsaMXFk CETbI+QguqwYSYQN/kOua4P8j3m/nyxGEya5L4oN7TqDfbVvSlIi+8TD9 oAndF3wfo1fXYCDigW4l+nsVzq5SsstlQJuQwFLEfvr3FWG9P3mWJm+6y M=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AQBOTHR1oRgX/T/mPsmDT+zVfbzU7u7jyIg8e44?= =?us-ascii?q?YmjLQLaKm44pD+JxGCt+51ggrPWoPWo7JfhuzavrqoeFRI4I3J8TgZdYBUER?= =?us-ascii?q?oMiMEYhQslVceOBEDTJ//xZCt8F8NHBxdo?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AXAACh8V5d/4YNJK1bCRsBAQEBAwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQcDAQEBgVMGAQEBCwGBRFADbVUgBAsqhCCDRwOEUoYYmkKBLhSBEANUCQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQwBARgNCAIBAYQ/AheCSCM0CQ4CCQEBBAEBAQIBBgRthS0MhUsCAQMBARA?= =?us-ascii?q?REQwBASwLAQ8CAQgaAiYCAgIlCxUQAgQBDQUigwABgWoDHQECDKBaAoE4iGF?= =?us-ascii?q?zgTKCewEBBYFGQYMVGIIWAwaBDCgBi24YgX+BEScfgkw+gmEBAQECAYEqAQg?= =?us-ascii?q?KAYMqMoImjB0kgiYxnEgJAoIdhmmJX4N1FAeCMYcwjmmNX4dkkC8CBAIEBQI?= =?us-ascii?q?OAQEFgVA4Z1gRCHAVOyoBgkGCQjiDOoUUhT9yAYEoiSyCQwEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,417,1559520000"; d="scan'208";a="619711516"
Received: from alln-core-12.cisco.com ([173.36.13.134]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 22 Aug 2019 19:53:26 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (xch-aln-016.cisco.com [173.36.7.26]) by alln-core-12.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x7MJrQPW020291 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 22 Aug 2019 19:53:26 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:53:26 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by xhs-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.210.228) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:53:25 -0400
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 14:53:24 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=WltSImTJJkQNd4kmVOgecjreaGUajna55I2Xj1i7JD7zbyGiHAw8LaoKOXfjpb1AiWnoOOYM1nr8aPXyFqfLmeNigLJHXcpazlaMsf5CafSTrrT076McUAV8/4ayS48KQSHgoVjzprOovbYflWfdMLwPjbnctzSsbWdea3093r3svomTos2nNCvE+oJ5i4eeWicUMGnyp+zz9f4l00ZqwLbYexkzLlDSCt9XjHOh9N8UUooKyqdYym3GUG/MKCPFk9QZvu3QeTx3NmvGxpqzBHGHprYLyfI3OwHiW6oDIZrggy6L94k5sXxnxbqFm9jKAfoTQTRcbslOPw8TgkFMsA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6vzVQxLQ2Fktv2eSUPe1Mn546xz6TPDuVY/+3V0ljRs=; b=R1lDJoWUIuSso58+NpJzFlT5t42SRqQcqDSsAudxHA1DD+2Y4faVHf/HfUyWGQ/3Nx0SQzCwdWdrI0SQgu1RvrQe0mAroKtQrJ48/jWg+2fio6G2r6BlQyudx2YkPrdfB2xVIsiN42pqtmJRx8+HInOO3qY0P3kOQx3w5qUJTPscgxbpydfzOpbgxzt62HeVsdyQiQ471vY13LGu4A3YneuWwCFQLnLqBQm8rQ/+67hb7Z/ecqLFk+CoxewelAMyH+u4cSxZciMikl0rAy0n3DbqWqzeVXGfRcG3eEs+n59XvkJLwZ2ED96gwebBp6Pe+xkqevHm7sRrM1Ld6WSlJw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=6vzVQxLQ2Fktv2eSUPe1Mn546xz6TPDuVY/+3V0ljRs=; b=I3pg3JcEvoN/r+ldYHBHFNWnUVpXvCcGuzkAEut0Pk0lstVkJPoREaLUIejYvEJQ0wntyf1rOzmQFPO1M8AFr3kYuYZeUyQwZdG8KqvODLLHK16XBbhQBZp4ciJYRLQ7ui/8vRl2axJraufpk3BDUe2XYt/+KTUo2rigYz1XbKY=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.38.14) by MN2PR11MB3776.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.251.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2178.20; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 19:53:24 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0]) by MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::859c:f271:3be2:74e0%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2178.020; Thu, 22 Aug 2019 19:53:23 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "stephane.litkowski@orange.com" <stephane.litkowski@orange.com>, "draft-ietf-ospf-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-yang@ietf.org>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "aretana.ietf@gmail.com" <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVWOxgmitmgVu6FUuRoXqc4ucSHacHUZuA
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 19:53:23 +0000
Message-ID: <E4AFD76B-E053-4DA3-812C-AFE48DAC6375@cisco.com>
References: <156648000780.14797.9094204995843360831.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156648000780.14797.9094204995843360831.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c4:1007::de]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 269a99b9-8196-4d95-672c-08d7273a6442
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MN2PR11MB3776;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3776:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 4
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB37760C92CDF3297E4AB99F36C2A50@MN2PR11MB3776.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 01371B902F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(376002)(396003)(136003)(346002)(39860400002)(189003)(199004)(2616005)(476003)(6116002)(486006)(446003)(11346002)(81156014)(81166006)(6512007)(8936002)(7736002)(8676002)(305945005)(6306002)(14454004)(102836004)(99286004)(229853002)(256004)(14444005)(6506007)(186003)(76176011)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(66476007)(76116006)(66946007)(46003)(36756003)(71200400001)(71190400001)(5660300002)(110136005)(54906003)(6486002)(316002)(478600001)(6436002)(966005)(25786009)(86362001)(4326008)(53936002)(2906002)(6246003)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3776; H:MN2PR11MB4221.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: EFn58+xskMck4K5qeKW3M1SiFBXm5uNYNcv6n3gWF+yOfcyDk9dagf2UlwbH6prkluZzWRn6AAg7N2L4kZyWMK7TSz7DmsBpWPoRmQejAkZNGz6AcjM0bRtrn3DSU77f5i107vIxpFOaF/zpYJOtKs2uIHDtzuilYqgLNzhNkQieb5J8IugEN8ePfwOHxSOjXpxhPGmF4LsOChGyHqGd+kK4+SmDWzQaR4BMB03KLV6Rli9nYT56qf35aTHu2NSo7J8gKNmYByyLbsOtcaf2ZPbe8BurdU1NLi2i+JT7zNQy2iBiSNSa70k+h3TDIdg6Br3QfT8yv3SMvlkJQIGtozufjlRX8JsCDrDKuKVdmjA+jpSnCM2uMKTlI5XnKaDE4MBq0mMH7taq4eQqe6Gb4JJt4dNK0YR1vM7B2Wmo448=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <3AA6CA54A5A75C43A8B547B1AC73372E@namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 269a99b9-8196-4d95-672c-08d7273a6442
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Aug 2019 19:53:23.7525 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: kqDoxptW0u2VSRBa2/Op/hyzkKMu6kcr6e2SAR6l6CfNIFvuaRQcR/51bloirTZn
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3776
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.26, xch-aln-016.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-12.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/oyUXRxVSuqPw_C1eblehueyAGTU>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 19:53:30 -0000

Hi Suresh, 

´╗┐On 8/22/19, 9:20 AM, "Lsr on behalf of Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker" <lsr-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of noreply@ietf.org>; wrote:

    Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
    draft-ietf-ospf-yang-26: No Objection
    
    When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
    email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
    introductory paragraph, however.)
    
    
    Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
    for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
    
    
    The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-yang/
    
    
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    COMMENT:
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    * Section 2.7
    
    Why are the neighbor configuration and operational state under different
    subtrees here? I thought one of the goals of NMDA was to avoid this.

I guess you mean the static-neighbors configuration. The reason is that the few parameters for static neighbors are only applicable to certain types of physical interfaces. You'll note that the operational state for neighbors is common to all interface types.
    
    * Section 2.9
    
    Is there a reason why the clear operation for neighbors is defined using an RPC
    operation instead of simply an action under the relevant interface?

It is interesting that we didn't get any comments suggesting to use "action" and now we've gotten two questions (including yours) in the last couple weeks. As defined, the RPCs are not specific to a single data node which is a requirement for "action" as they clear multiple neighbors and all the LSDBs. Also, they are functional as is defined. We could add more granular actions in the future. We've already started an augmentation for more recent protocol extensions. 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospf-yang-augmentation-v1/

    
    * Meta comment
    
    NMDA is misspelt as NDMA in several places throughout the document including
    the abstract and the introduction. Suggest a global search and replace.

This will be in version -27. You can tell my fingers were accustomed to typing NBMA (Non-Broadcast Multi-Access) and NDMA was just too close. 
    
    Editorial
    ========
    
    * Under ospfv2-lsa-option
    
    s/Baes idenity/Base identity/

Fixed. 

Thanks,
Acee
    
    
    _______________________________________________
    Lsr mailing list
    Lsr@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr